Water clustering in polychloroprene

Type Publication
Date 2014-06
Language English
Copyright 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Author(s) Le Gac Pierre-YvesORCID1, Roux Gerard2, Davies PeterORCID1, Fayolle Bruno3, Verdu Jacques3
Affiliation(s) 1 : IFREMER, Ctr Bretagne, Marine Struct Lab, F-29280 Plouzane, France.
2 : Thales Underwater Syst, F-06903 Sophia Antipolis, France.
3 : Arts & Metiers ParisTech, PIMM, F-75013 Paris, France.
Source Polymer (0032-3861) (Elsevier Sci Ltd), 2014-06 , Vol. 55 , N. 12 , P. 2861-2866
DOI 10.1016/j.polymer.2014.04.024
WOS© Times Cited 11
Keyword(s) Polychloroprene, Water sorption, Clustering
Abstract Water sorption has been studied gravimetrically for polychloroprene rubber samples, first at a fixed hygrometric ratio (98% HR) and several temperatures (25, 40, 60 and 80°C) for samples of 1.9 and 3.8 mm thickness (Constant Temperature and Hygrometry, CTH experiments), then at fixed temperature (40°C) and several hygrometric ratios ranging from 0 to 95% HR on samples of 0.1 mm thickness (DVS experiments). CTH experiments reveal an abnormal sorption behavior: after an apparently fickian transient period, the water absorption continues at almost constant rate, no equilibrium is observed after more than 2500 hours, whatever the temperature. DVS experiments reveal a very low Henry’s solubility but the formation of clusters at water activities higher than 40%. The water diffusivity is almost independent of activity below 50% HR and decreases rapidly when activity increases above 50%. Contrary to CTH experiments, equilibrium is reached in DVS and the difference is not simply linked to the well-known effect of sample thickness on diffusion rate. The results allows hypotheses such as hydrolysis or osmotic cracking to explain the abnormal sorption phenomenon to be rejected. It is suggested that clusters could be polymer-water complexes having a linear / branched structure able to grow without phase separation that could explain the reversibility of sorption-desorption cycles. The difference of behavior between thin 0.1 mm and thicker 1.9 or 3.8mm samples could be due to an effect of swelling stresses.
Full Text
File Pages Size Access
Author's final draft 19 359 KB Open access
6 798 KB Access on demand
Top of the page