In vitro consumption of Caulerpa taxifolia (Chlorophyta) by accustomed and non-accustomed Paracentrotus lividus (Echinoid): Seasonal variations

Type Article
Date 1998-02
Language English
Author(s) Ganteaume A, Gobert J, Malestroit Pascale, Menager V, Francour P, Boudouresque Cf
Affiliation(s) Fac Sci Luminy, Lab Biol Marine & Ecol Benthos, CNRS, EP 75, F-13288 Marseille 09, France.
Source Journal Of The Marine Biological Association Of The United Kingdom (0025-3154) (Cambridge Univ Press), 1998-02 , Vol. 78 , N. 1 , P. 239-248
DOI 10.1017/S0025315400040066
WOS© Times Cited 7
Abstract In vitro short time experiments (a few weeks) show that daily ingestion by Paracentrotus lividus (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) is weak (0-81 mg DW d(-1) ind(-1)) for Caulerpa taxifolia (Chlorophyta), compared to the data recorded with an almost totally avoided brown alga, Cystoseira compressa (24-137 mg DW d(-1) ind(-1)) and with a preferred brown alga, Halopteris scoparin (79-397 mg DW d(-1) ind(-1)). There is no significant difference between spring (when the toxic metabolite content is at its minimum) and summer-autumn (when it is at its maximum). In contrast, the absorption rate of the sea urchin fed on Caulerpa taxifolia is significantly weaker in spring than in summer-autumn. Overall, the daily absorbed weight is negative in spring with C. taxifolia (compared with 18 mg DW d(-1) ind(-1) with Cystoseira compressa and 25 mg DW d(-1) ind(-1) with H. scoparia). It has also been demonstrated that P. lividus becomes accustomed to Caulerpa taxifolia, at least for short time experiments: the echinoid consumes greater quantities of this alga especially if it is fresh when it has already consumed it previously.
Full Text
File Pages Size Access
30589.pdf 10 691 KB Open access
Top of the page

How to cite 

Ganteaume A, Gobert J, Malestroit Pascale, Menager V, Francour P, Boudouresque Cf (1998). In vitro consumption of Caulerpa taxifolia (Chlorophyta) by accustomed and non-accustomed Paracentrotus lividus (Echinoid): Seasonal variations. Journal Of The Marine Biological Association Of The United Kingdom, 78(1), 239-248. Publisher's official version : https://doi.org/10.1017/S0025315400040066 , Open Access version : https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00210/32132/