FN Archimer Export Format PT J TI A moderate melting model for the Voring margin (Norway) based on structural observations and a thermo-kinematical modelling: Implication for the meaning of the lower crustal bodies BT AF GERNIGON, Laurent LUCAZEAU, Francis BRIGAUD, Frederic RINGENBACH, Jean-Claude PLANKE, Sverre LE GALL, Bernard AS 1:1,6;2:2;3:3;4:4;5:5;6:1,6; FF 1:;2:;3:;4:;5:;6:; C1 IFREMER, F-29280 Plouzane, France. CNRS, Inst Phys Globe, F-75252 Paris 05, France. Ctr Sci & Tech Jean Feger, Total Pau, F-64018 Pau, France. Total GSR PN, F-92078 Paris, France. VBPR, PGP, N-0349 Oslo, Norway. C2 IFREMER, FRANCE CNRS, FRANCE TOTAL, FRANCE TOTAL, FRANCE VBPR, NORWAY UBO, FRANCE SI BREST SE PDG-DOP-DCB-GM IN WOS Ifremer jusqu'en 2018 copubli-france copubli-europe copubli-univ-france IF 1.675 TC 68 UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/2006/publication-1042.pdf LA English DT Article DE ;Mantle plume;Norwegian margin;Underplating;Breakup;Modelling;Rifting;Volcanic margins AB High P-wave velocities (7.1-7.8 km/s) lower crustal bodies (LCBs) imaged along volcanic margins are commonly interpreted as plume and break-up-related thick mafic underplating. This interpretation is partly challenged in this paper based on new seismic observations and modelling of the outer Voring Basin (Norway). An exceptional strong amplitude reflection, the T Reflection, is particularly well defined below the North Gjallar Ridge (NGR) between 7 and 8 s TWT. The T Reflection is located near the volcanic lava flows emplaced during the NE Atlantic breakup (similar to 55-54 Ma ago) and coincides with the top of the LCB, forming a mid-crustal dome. Based on structural and temporal relationships, we show that the dome clearly influences the structural development of the NGR and predates the continental breakup at least by 10-15 Ma. Using a thermo-kinematical model, we tried also to investigate and quantify the relationships between the extension, LCB and the magmatic production. Modelling suggests that significant Paleocene-Early Eocene magmatism can be produced without any temperature anomaly in the mantle if differential stretching occurs during the break-up initiation. The conclusion of 2D thermo-kinematical parametric analysis is that the magmatic model predicts, either little extension (beta < 2) with no melting or high extension (beta > 5) with significant melting along the outer Voring Basin. We suggest that the continental part of the LCB could not necessarily be breakup-related and so magmatic, as has often been stated previously. It is concluded here that the continental part of the LCB observed beneath the outer Voring Basin may be partly (or fully) attributed to inherited, high-pressure granulite/eclogite lower crustal rocks. The real amount of mafic material emplaced along the outer Voring Basin could be 20-40% less than thought. PY 2006 SO Tectonophysics SN 0040-1951 PU Elsevier VL 412 IS 3-4 UT 000234844800009 BP 255 EP 278 DI 10.1016/j.tecto.2005.10.038 ID 1042 ER EF