FN Archimer Export Format
PT J
TI Fractionation of fish protein hydrolysates by ultrafiltration and nanofiltration: impact on peptidic populations
BT 
AF BOURSEAU, Patrick
   VANDANJON, Laurent
   JAOUEN, Pascal
   CHAPLAIN-DEROUINIOT, Maryse
   MASSE, Anthony
   GUERARD, Fabienne
   CHABEAUD, Aurélie
   FOUCHEREAU-PERON, Martine
   LE GAL, Yves
   RAVALLEC-PLE, Rosenn
   BERGE, Jean-Pascal
   PICOT, Laurent
   PIOT, Jean -Marie
   BATISTA, Ireneu
   THORKELSSON, Gudjon
   DELANNOY, Charles
   JAKOBSEN, Greta
   JOHANSSON, Inger
AS 1:1,2;2:1,2;3:1;4:1;5:1;6:3;7:2,3;8:4;9:4;10:5;11:6;12:;13:;14:7;15:8;16:9;17:10;18:10;
FF 1:;2:;3:;4:;5:;6:;7:;8:;9:;10:;11:PDG-DOP-DCN-BRM-STBM;12:;13:;14:;15:;16:;17:;18:;
C1 Univ Nantes, CNRS, UMR 6144, GEPEA, St Nazaire, France.
   Univ Europeenne Bretagne, UBS, LIMATB, F-56321 Lorient, France.
   Univ Bretagne Occidentale, Lab ANTiOX, Quimper, France.
   UPMC, MNHN, CNRS, Stn Biol Marine,UMR 5178, Concarneau, France.
   USTL, Polytech Lille, ProBioGEM, Lille, France.
   STAM, IFREMER, Nantes, France.
   Ipimar, Lisbon, Portugal.
   Matis Ohf, Reykjavik, Iceland.
   Copalis CTPP, Boulogne Sur Mer, France.
   Marinova, Hojmark, Denmark.
C2 UNIV NANTES, FRANCE
   UEB, FRANCE
   UBO, FRANCE
   UNIV PARIS 06, FRANCE
   UNIV LILLE, FRANCE
   IFREMER, FRANCE
   IPIMAR, PORTUGAL
   MATIS OHF, ICELAND
   COPALIS, FRANCE
   MARINOVA, DENMARK
   UBS, FRANCE
SI NANTES
SE PDG-DOP-DCN-BRM-STBM
IN WOS Ifremer jusqu'en 2018
   copubli-france
   copubli-europe
   copubli-univ-france
   copubli-int-hors-europe
IF 2.034
TC 59
UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/2009/publication-6653.pdf
LA English
DT Article
DE ;Peptidic profile;Fractionation process;Membrane separation;Nanofiltration;Ultrafiltration;FPH;Fish protein hydrolysate
AB The production by enzymatic treatment of fish protein hydrolysates (FPH) is a promising route to add value to fisheries proteinic co-products (fish frames, heads etc.). Indeed, FPH possess good nutritional properties and biological activities for food and feed uses. Pressure-driven membrane separations such as ultrafiltration (UF) and nanofiltration (NF) can be used after the hydrolysis to, increase the specific activities of the FPH. This paper discusses the impact of a two-step UF/NF process producing four different fractions on two industrial FPH with different hydrolysis degrees. Fractionation is carried out in "realistic" conditions for an industrial process, on highly concentrated FPH solutions (about 100 g of dry matter/L) at a high volume reduction factor. For each step, UF or NF, the variation of the permeation flux in the course of the fractionation is discussed according to the FPH hydrolysis degree and the membranes cut-offs. The values of performance indicators defined in terms of nitrogen content are also examined, including the concentration factor (CF), the relative recovery in the retentate(eta(R)) and the mean and final retention factors (RFm and RFf). Computed values of these indicators are validated through the setting of volume and mass balances around each step. The impact of fractionation on the FPH peptidic population is shown. Peptidic populations are described in terms of chromatographic profiles (SEC-FPLC). The UF fractionation produces a permeate enriched with respect to the FPH smaller than a molecular weight of about 600-750 Dalton, and a retentate enriched in large peptides (above the same MW). A similar behaviour is found for the NF fractionation. Comparing the impact of the UF fractionation on the two hydrolysates allows to conclude that the membrane cut-off is well-suited when comprised between the MWs of the biggest and the most abundant peptides in the FPH.
PY 2009
PD AUG
SO Desalination
SN 0011-9164
PU Elsevier
VL 244
IS 1-3
UT 000267912600030
BP 303
EP 320
DI 10.1016/j.desal.2008.05.026
ID 6653
ER

EF