FN Archimer Export Format
PT J
TI The good(ish), the bad, and the ugly: a tripartite classification of ecosystem trends
BT 
AF BUNDY, Alida
   SHANNON, Lynne J.
   ROCHET, Marie-Joelle
   NEIRA, Sergio
   SHIN, Yunne-Jai
   HILL, Louize
   AYDIN, Kerim
AS 1:1;2:7,8;3:2;4:3,9;5:4;6:5;7:6;
FF 1:;2:;3:PDG-DOP-DCN-EMH;4:;5:;6:;7:;
C1 Fisheries & Oceans Canada, Bedford Inst Oceanog, Dartmouth, NS B2Y 4A2, Canada.
   IFREMER, Dept Ecol & Modeles Halieut, F-44311 Nantes 03, France.
   Univ Concepcion, Dept Oceanog, Concepcion, Chile.
   Inst Rech Dev, UMR EME 212, F-34203 Sete, France.
   IPIMAR, P-1449006 Lisbon, Portugal.
   Alaska Fisheries Sci Ctr AFSC, Seattle, WA 98115 USA.
   Univ Cape Town, Dept Zool, ZA-7701 Cape Town, South Africa.
   Univ Cape Town, Marine Res Inst, ZA-7701 Cape Town, South Africa.
   Ctr Invest Ecosistemas Patagonia, Coyhaique, Chile.
C2 MPO, CANADA
   IFREMER, FRANCE
   UNIV CONCEPCION, CHILE
   IRD, FRANCE
   IPIMAR, PORTUGAL
   AFSC, USA
   UNIV CAPE TOWN, SOUTH AFRICA
   UNIV CAPE TOWN, SOUTH AFRICA
   CTR INVEST ECOSISTEMAS PATAGONIA, CHILE
SI NANTES
SE PDG-DOP-DCN-EMH
IN WOS Ifremer jusqu'en 2018
   copubli-france
   copubli-p187
   copubli-europe
   copubli-int-hors-europe
   copubli-sud
IF 1.808
TC 55
TU Institut de recherche pour le développement
   Institut français de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer
   Université de Montpellier
UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00002/11374/12047.pdf
LA English
DT Article
CR IBTS 2000
   IBTS 2001
   IBTS 2002
   IBTS 2003
   IBTS 2004
   IBTS 2005
   IBTS 92/2
   IBTS 93/1
   IBTS 93/2
   IBTS 94/1
   IBTS 94/2
   IBTS 95/1
   IBTS 95/2
   IBTS 96/1
   IBTS 96/2
   IBTS 97
   IBTS 98
   IBTS 99
   IYFS 92 - IBTS 92/1
BO Thalassa
DE ;comparative approach;decision tree;ecosystem classification;ecosystem indicator;exploited marine ecosystems
AB Marine ecosystems have been exploited for a long time, growing increasingly vulnerable to collapse and irreversible change. How do we know when an ecosystem may be in danger? A measure of the status of individual stocks is only a partial gauge of its status, and does not include changes at the broader ecosystem level, to non-commercial species or to its structure or functioning. Six ecosystem indicators measuring trends over time were collated for 19 ecosystems, corresponding to four ecological attributes: resource potential, ecosystem structure and functioning, conservation of functional biodiversity, and ecosystem stability and resistance to perturbations. We explored the use of a decision-tree approach, a definition of initial ecosystem state (impacted or non-impacted), and the trends in the ecosystem indicators to classify the ecosystems into improving, stationary, and deteriorating. Ecosystem experts classified all ecosystems as impacted at the time of their initial state. Of these, 15 were diagnosed as "ugly", because they had deteriorated from an already impacted state. Several also exhibited specific combinations of trends indicating "fishing down the foodweb", reduction in size structure, reduction in diversity and stability, and changed productivity. The classification provides an initial evaluation for scientists, resource managers, stakeholders, and the general public of the concerning status of ecosystems globally.
PY 2010
PD MAY
SO Ices Journal of Marine Science : Journal du Conseil
SN 1054-3139
PU Oxford University Press
VL 67
IS 4
UT 000276732500013
BP 745
EP 768
DI 10.1093/icesjms/fsp283
ID 11374
ER

EF