FN Archimer Export Format
PT J
TI Quota allocation in mixed fisheries: a bioeconomic modelling approach applied to the Channel flatfish fisheries
BT 
AF MARCHAL, Paul
   LITTLE, L. Richard
   THEBAUD, Olivier
AS 1:1;2:2;3:3;
FF 1:PDG-RBE-HMMN-RHBL;2:;3:;
C1 IFREMER, Channel & N Sea Fisheries Dept, F-62321 Boulogne S Mer, France
   CSIRO Marine & Atmospher Res, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
   CSIRO Marine & Atmospher Res, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia
C2 IFREMER, FRANCE
   CSIRO, AUSTRALIA
   CSIRO, AUSTRALIA
SI BOULOGNE
SE PDG-RBE-HMMN-RHBL
IN WOS Ifremer jusqu'en 2018
   copubli-int-hors-europe
IF 2.007
TC 19
UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00044/15492/12971.pdf
LA English
DT Article
DE ;Channel flatfish mixed fisheries;fisheries management;fleet dynamics;individual quotas;overquota landing tax;plaice (Pleuronectes platessa);sole (Solea solea)
AB A simulation modelling approach is used to assess the respective performances of different regimes of quota allocation (fixed or transferable), quota ownership (owned or not by fishers), and taxation for catching fish above quota. The simulations account for a variety of fleet behaviours (ranging from fixed by tradition to dynamic economics-driven). The modelling framework is applied to the Channel flatfish mixed fisheries. Transferable quota allocation regimes would particularly benefit small netters and beam trawlers, which would achieve a profit of (sic)50-150 million without compromising the conservation of eastern Channel sole, but it could impair the sustainability of other stocks. If quota is owned by fishers, the least fishing-efficient fleet stops fishing, but makes substantial profit from leasing quotas to beam trawlers and to small and large netters, which remain actively fishing. The highest economic return for quota owners ((sic)200-300 million) is achieved when effort allocation is fixed by tradition. The profit achieved by small netters is greatest when fleets are almost entirely economics-driven. Increasing overquota landing taxes generally leads to conservation benefits for all stocks, but at the expense of lower profitability for the fishery overall.
PY 2011
PD JUN
SO Ices Journal Of Marine Science
SN 1054-3139
PU Oxford Univ Press
VL 68
IS 7
UT 000294167800020
BP 1580
EP 1591
DI 10.1093/icesjms/fsr096
ID 15492
ER

EF