FN Archimer Export Format
PT J
TI Global Conservation Priorities for Marine Turtles
BT 
AF WALLACE, Bryan P.
   DIMATTEO, Andrew D.
   BOLTEN, Alan B.
   CHALOUPKA, Milani Y.
   HUTCHINSON, Brian J.
   ABREU-GROBOIS, F. Alberto
   MORTIMER, Jeanne A.
   SEMINOFF, Jeffrey A.
   AMOROCHO, Diego
   BJORNDAL, Karen A.
   BOURJEA, Jerome
   BOWEN, Brian W.
   BRISENO DUENAS, Raquel
   CASALE, Paolo
   CHOUDHURY, B. C.
   COSTA, Alice
   DUTTON, Peter H.
   FALLABRINO, Alejandro
   FINKBEINER, Elena M.
   GIRARD, Alexandre
   GIRONDOT, Marc
   HAMANN, Mark
   HURLEY, Brendan J.
   LOPEZ-MENDILAHARSU, Milagros
   ANGELA MARCOVALDI, Maria
   MUSICK, John A.
   NEL, Ronel
   PILCHER, Nicolas J.
   TROENG, Sebastian
   WITHERINGTON, Blair
   MAST, Roderic B.
AS 1:1,2,3;2:1,4;3:1,5;4:1,6;5:1,2;6:1,7;7:1,8,9;8:1,10;9:1,11;10:1,5;11:1,12;12:1,13;13:1,14;14:1,15,16;15:1,17;16:1,18;17:1,19;18:1,20;19:1,3;20:1,21;21:1,22;22:1,23;23:1,2;24:1,24,25;25:1,24;26:1,26;27:1,27;28:1,28;29:1,2,29,30;30:1,31;31:1,2;
FF 1:;2:;3:;4:;5:;6:;7:;8:;9:;10:;11:PDG-RBE-DOI;12:;13:;14:;15:;16:;17:;18:;19:;20:;21:;22:;23:;24:;25:;26:;27:;28:;29:;30:;31:;
C1 IUCN SSC Marine Turtle Specialist Grp, Burning Issues Working Grp, Arlington, VA USA.
   Conservat Int, Global Marine Div, Arlington, VA USA.
   Duke Univ, Div Marine Sci & Conservat, Beaufort, NC USA.
   Duke Univ, Marine Geospatial Ecol Lab, Durham, NC USA.
   Univ Florida, Dept Biol, Gainesville, FL USA.
   Univ Queensland, Ecol Modelling Serv Pty Ltd, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
   Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Unidad Acad Mazatlan, Inst Ciencias Mar & Limnol, Mazatlan, Sinaloa, Mexico.
   University of Florida, department of Biology, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America
   NOAA, Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, Marine Turtle Ecol & Assessment Program, SW Fisheries Sci Ctr, La Jolla, CA USA.
   Isl Conservat Soc, Victoria, Mahe, Seychelles.
   Ctr Invest Medio Ambiente & Desarrollo, Cali, Colombia.
   IFREMER, Lab Ressources Halieut, Ile De La Reunion, France.
   Hawaii Inst Marine Biol, Kaneohe, HI USA.
   Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Inst Ciencias Mar & Limnol, Banco Informac Tortugas Marinas BITMAR, Unidad Mazatlan, Mazatlan, Sinaloa, Mexico.
   Univ Roma La Sapienza, Dept Biol & Biotechnol Charles Darwin, Rome, Italy.
   World Wildlife Fund Italy, WWF Mediterranean Turtle Programme, Rome, Italy.
   Wildlife Inst India, Dept Endangered Species Management, Dehra Dun, Uttarakhand, India.
   World Wildlife Fund Mozamb, Maputo, Mozambique.
   Natl Ocean & Atmospher Adm, SW Fisheries Sci Ctr, Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, La Jolla, CA USA
   Karumbe, Montevideo, Uruguay.
   Assoc RENATURA, Pointe Noire, Congo.
   Univ Paris 11, Lab Ecol Syst & Evolut, Orsay, France.
   James Cook Univ, Sch Earth & Environm Sci, Townsville, Qld, Australia
   Fundacao Pro Tamar, Projeto Tamar ICMBio, Salvador, BA, Brazil.
   Univ Estado Rio de Janeiro, Dept Ecol, Inst Biol, BR-20550011 Rio De Janeiro, Brazil.
   Virginia Inst Marine Sci, Coll William & Mary, Gloucester Point, VA 23062 USA.
   Nelson Mandela Metropolitan Univ, Sch Environm Sci, Summerstrand Campus, South Africa.
   Marine Res Fdn, Sabah, Malaysia.
   Lund Univ, Dept Anim Ecol, S-22362 Lund, Sweden.
   Sea Turtle Conservancy, Sci Advisory Comm, Gainesville, FL USA.
   Florida Fish & Wildlife Conservat Commiss, Melbourne Beach, FL USA.
C2 IUCN SSC, USA
   CONSERVAT INT, USA
   UNIV DUKE, USA
   UNIV DUKE, USA
   UNIV FLORIDA, USA
   UNIV QUEENSLAND, AUSTRALIA
   UNIV UNAM, MEXICO
   UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA, USA
   NOAA, USA
   ISL CONSERVAT SOC, SEYCHELLES
   CTR INVEST MEDIO AMBIENTE & DESARROLLO, COLOMBIA
   IFREMER, FRANCE
   HAWAII INST MARINE BIOL, USA
   UNIV UNAM, MEXICO
   UNIV ROMA LA SAPIENZA, ITALY
   WWF, ITALY
   WILDLIFE INST INDIA, INDIA
   WWF, MOZAMBIQUE
   NOAA, USA
   KARUMBE, URUGUAY
   ASSOC RENATURA, CONGO
   UNIV PARIS 11, FRANCE
   UNIV JAMES COOK, AUSTRALIA
   FUNDACAO PRO TAMAR, BRAZIL
   UNIV ESTADO RIO DE JANEIRO, BRAZIL
   VIRGINIA INST MARINE SCI, USA
   UNIV NELSON MANDELA METROPOLITAN, SOUTH AFRICA
   MARINE RES FDN, MALAYSIA
   UNIV LUND, SWEDEN
   SEA TURTLE CONSERVANCY, USA
   FLORIDA FISH & WILDLIFE CONSERVAT COMMISS, USA
SI LA REUNION
SE PDG-RBE-DOI
IN WOS Ifremer jusqu'en 2018
   copubli-france
   copubli-europe
   copubli-univ-france
   copubli-int-hors-europe
   copubli-sud
IF 4.092
TC 305
UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00050/16097/13573.pdf
LA English
DT Article
AB Where conservation resources are limited and conservation targets are diverse, robust yet flexible priority-setting frameworks are vital. Priority-setting is especially important for geographically widespread species with distinct populations subject to multiple threats that operate on different spatial and temporal scales. Marine turtles are widely distributed and exhibit intra-specific variations in population sizes and trends, as well as reproduction and morphology. However, current global extinction risk assessment frameworks do not assess conservation status of spatially and biologically distinct marine turtle Regional Management Units (RMUs), and thus do not capture variations in population trends, impacts of threats, or necessary conservation actions across individual populations. To address this issue, we developed a new assessment framework that allowed us to evaluate, compare and organize marine turtle RMUs according to status and threats criteria. Because conservation priorities can vary widely (i.e. from avoiding imminent extinction to maintaining long-term monitoring efforts) we developed a "conservation priorities portfolio" system using categories of paired risk and threats scores for all RMUs (n = 58). We performed these assessments and rankings globally, by species, by ocean basin, and by recognized geopolitical bodies to identify patterns in risk, threats, and data gaps at different scales. This process resulted in characterization of risk and threats to all marine turtle RMUs, including identification of the world's 11 most endangered marine turtle RMUs based on highest risk and threats scores. This system also highlighted important gaps in available information that is crucial for accurate conservation assessments. Overall, this priority-setting framework can provide guidance for research and conservation priorities at multiple relevant scales, and should serve as a model for conservation status assessments and priority-setting for widespread, long-lived taxa.
PY 2011
PD SEP
SO Plos One
SN 1932-6203
PU Public Library Science
VL 6
IS 9
UT 000295936900009
BP 1
EP 14
DI 10.1371/journal.pone.0024510
ID 16097
ER

EF