FN Archimer Export Format
PT J
TI Effect of shear velocity and flow regimes on scallop post-larval detachment feed on two different diets
BT 
AF GAGNE, Renee
   TREMBLAY, Rejean
   OLIVIER, Frederic
   PERNET, Fabrice
   MINER, Philippe
   SAMAIN, Jean-Francois
AS 1:1;2:1;3:1,2;4:3;5:4;6:4;
FF 1:;2:;3:;4:PDG-RBE-PFOM;5:PDG-RBE-PFOM-PI;6:;
C1 Univ Quebec, Inst Sci Mer, Rimouski, PQ G5L 3A1, Canada.
   CRESCO, CNRS MNHN IRD P6, UMR BOREA 7208, Museum Natl Hist Nat,Dept Milieux & Peuplements A, F-35800 Dinard, France.
   IFREMER, Lab Environm Ressources, F-34203 Sete, France.
   IFREMER DRV A, Lab Physiol Mollusques, Ctr Brest, F-29280 Plouzane, France.
C2 UNIV QUEBEC, CANADA
   MNHN, FRANCE
   IFREMER, FRANCE
   IFREMER, FRANCE
SI DINARD
   BREST
SE MNHND
   PDG-RBE-PFOM
   PDG-RBE-PFOM-PI
IN WOS Ifremer jusqu'en 2018
   copubli-france
   copubli-int-hors-europe
IF 2.01
TC 3
UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00111/22219/20056.pdf
LA English
DT Article
DE ;Attachment;Pecten maximus;Benthic boundary layer;Flume;Diet
AB Through biological flume experiments, we studied the effect of shear velocity and attachment period on the percent detachment of Pecten maximus post-larvae of different sizes reared on two experimental diets. The first diet, (Pavlova lutheri, Isochrysis galbana, Chaetoceros calcitrans), which served as a reference diet (PTC), is commonly used in bivalve hatcheries; the second is the PTC diet with the addition of Rhodomonas salina (PTCR). Our results indicate that the detachment of post-larvae fed PTCR diet showed significant interactions between scallop length, attachment period and shear stress, while the post-larvae feed with the PTC diet showed only effect of shear stress factor. Furthermore, post-larvae exposed to various flume velocities showed different percentages of detachment according to diet (PTC=36% and PTCR=57%) for flow velocities between 1.42 to 2.45 cm s(-1) after 12 h attachment periods. This result could be related to differences in the biochemical composition of post-larvae as discussed. (C) 2012 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.
PY 2012
PD DEC
SO Aquaculture
SN 0044-8486
PU Elsevier Science Bv
VL 370-371
UT 000311215700024
BP 172
EP 178
DI 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2012.10.017
ID 22219
ER

EF