FN Archimer Export Format PT J TI Molecular Phylogeny of the Astrophorida (Porifera, Demospongiae(rho)) Reveals an Unexpected High Level of Spicule Homoplasy BT AF CARDENAS, Paco XAVIER, Joana R. REVEILLAUD, Julie SCHANDER, Christoffer RAPP, Hans Tore AS 1:1;2:2,3;3:4,5;4:1,6;5:1,6; FF 1:;2:;3:;4:;5:; C1 Univ Bergen, Dept Biol, Bergen, Norway. Univ Azores, Dept Biol, CIBIO Azores, CIBIO Res Ctr Biodivers & Genet Resources, Azores, Portugal. CEAB Ctr Adv Studies Blanes CSIC, Blanes, Spain. Univ Ghent, Dept Biol, Marine Biol Sect, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium. Ctr Mol Phylogeny & Evolut, CeMoFE, Ghent, Belgium. Univ Bergen, Ctr Geobiol, Bergen, Norway. C2 UNIV BERGEN, NORWAY UNIV AZORES, PORTUGAL CSIC, SPAIN UNIV GHENT, BELGIUM UNIV GHENT, BELGIUM UNIV BERGEN, NORWAY IF 4.092 TC 17 TU Centre national de la recherche scientifique Institut de recherche pour le développement Muséum national d'histoire naturelle Université Pierre et Marie Curie Université de Caen Normandie Université des Antilles UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00137/24817/22903.pdf LA English DT Article CR MEDECO BO Unknown AB Background: The Astrophorida (Porifera, Demospongiae(rho)) is geographically and bathymetrically widely distributed. Systema Porifera currently includes five families in this order: Ancorinidae, Calthropellidae, Geodiidae, Pachastrellidae and Thrombidae. To date, molecular phylogenetic studies including Astrophorida species are scarce and offer limited sampling. Phylogenetic relationships within this order are therefore for the most part unknown and hypotheses based on morphology largely untested. Astrophorida taxa have very diverse spicule sets that make them a model of choice to investigate spicule evolution. Methodology/Principal Findings: With a sampling of 153 specimens (9 families, 29 genera, 89 species) covering the deep- and shallow-waters worldwide, this work presents the first comprehensive molecular phylogeny of the Astrophorida, using a cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) gene partial sequence and the 59 end terminal part of the 28S rDNA gene (C1-D2 domains). The resulting tree suggested that i) the Astrophorida included some lithistid families and some Alectonidae species, ii) the sub-orders Euastrophorida and Streptosclerophorida were both polyphyletic, iii) the Geodiidae, the Ancorinidae and the Pachastrellidae were not monophyletic, iv) the Calthropellidae was part of the Geodiidae clade (Calthropella at least), and finally that v) many genera were polyphyletic (Ecionemia, Erylus, Poecillastra, Penares, Rhabdastrella, Stelletta and Vulcanella). Conclusion: The Astrophorida is a larger order than previously considered, comprising ca. 820 species. Based on these results, we propose new classifications for the Astrophorida using both the classical rank-based nomenclature (i.e., Linnaean classification) and the phylogenetic nomenclature following the PhyloCode, independent of taxonomic rank. A key to the Astrophorida families, sub-families and genera incertae sedis is also included. Incongruences between our molecular tree and the current classification can be explained by the banality of convergent evolution and secondary loss in spicule evolution. These processes have taken place many times, in all the major clades, for megascleres and microscleres. PY 2011 PD APR SO Plos One SN 1932-6203 PU Public Library Science VL 6 IS 4 UT 000289292800008 DI 10.1371/journal.pone.0018318 ID 24817 ER EF