FN Archimer Export Format
PT C
TI Numerical modelling of equilibrium and evolving lightweight sediment laboratory beach profiles.
BT 
AF DUBARBIER, Benjamin
   CASTELLE, Bruno
   MARIEU, Vincent
   MICHALLET, Hervé
   GRASSO, Florent
   RUESSINK, Gerben
AS 1:1;2:1;3:1;4:2;5:3;6:4;
FF 1:;2:;3:;4:;5:PDG-ODE-DYNECO-PHYSED;6:;
C1 UMR EPOC, University of Bordeaux, Avenue des Facultés, Talence 33405, France
   Laboratoire des Ecoulements Géophysiques et Industriels, CNRS, BP 53, 38041 Grenoble cedex 9, France.
   IFREMER, Laboratoire de physique hydrodynamique et sédimentaire DYNECO/PHYSED Centre de Bretagne, BP 70, 29280 Plouzané, France
   Faculty of Geosciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, 3508 TC, The Netherlands
C2 UNIV BORDEAUX, FRANCE
   INPG, FRANCE
   IFREMER, FRANCE
   UNIV UTRECHT, NETHERLANDS
SI BREST
SE PDG-ODE-DYNECO-PHYSED
UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00180/29089/27503.pdf
LA English
DT Proceedings paper
DE ;Beach profile;numerical model;physical modelling;equilibrium profile;sandbar migration
AB The recent advances of numerical beach profile models allowed the simulation of on/offshore sandbar migrations on timescales of weeks to months with fair success. These models were systematically applied to natural, persistently evolving, beaches. In this contribution, we apply our model to small-scale laboratory experiments for which coarse and lightweight sediment is used to satisfy the laws of similitude in the flume. Such experiments can result in equilibrium beach profiles and provide detailed information on the respective role of undertow and wave nonlinearities on sediment transport and the resulting cross-shore sandbar migration. Here we first apply the coupled, wave-averaged, cross-shore waves-currents-bathymetric evolution model 1DBeach to an equilibrium beach profile. The model simulates an equilibrium beach profile with reasonable success. Yet, when applying the best fit parameters to a subsequent rapid onshore sandbar migration, the model fails in reproducing the overall beach profile evolution. Further model calibration on the evolving beach profile sequence shows that the model can actually reproduce the rapid onshore sandbar migration with a significant contribution of acceleration skewness. This suggests that a number of misspecifications of the physics remain in coupled, wave-averaged, cross-shore waves-currents-bathymetric evolution model. In addition, given that best-fit model free parameters are of the same order of magnitude of those found on natural beaches, our study suggests that small-scale experiments with coarse and lightweight sediment can be used to further explore the respective contribution of wave nonlinearities and undertow to sediment transport and the overall beach profile evolution
PY 2013
CT Proceedings on Coastal Dynamics 2013, pp.521-530
ID 29089
ER

EF