FN Archimer Export Format PT J TI SMOS salinity in the subtropical north Atlantic salinity maximum: 1. Comparison with Aquarius and in situ salinity BT AF HERNANDEZ, Olga BOUTIN, Jacqueline KOLODZIEJCZYK, Nicolas REVERDIN, Gilles MARTIN, Nicolas GAILLARD, Fabienne REUL, Nicolas VERGELY, J. L. AS 1:1;2:1;3:1;4:1;5:1;6:2;7:3;8:4; FF 1:;2:;3:PDG-ODE-LPO;4:;5:;6:PDG-ODE-LPO;7:PDG-ODE-LOS;8:; C1 LOCEAN IPSL, Paris, France. LPO IFREMER, Brest, France. LOS IFREMER, Toulon, France. ACRI ST, Paris, France. C2 IPSL, FRANCE IFREMER, FRANCE IFREMER, FRANCE ACRI ST, FRANCE SI BREST TOULON SE PDG-ODE-LPO PDG-ODE-LOS IN WOS Ifremer jusqu'en 2018 copubli-france TC 31 UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00210/32150/34082.pdf LA English DT Article CR STRASSE BO Thalassa DE ;SMOS;salinity;remote sensing;subtropical North Atlantic AB Sea surface salinity (SSS) measured from space by the Soil Moisture and Ocean Salinity (SMOS) mission is validated in the subtropical North Atlantic Ocean. 39 transects of ships of opportunity equipped with thermosalinographs (TSG) crossed that region from 2010 to 2012, providing a large database of ground truth SSS. SMOS SSS is also compared to Aquarius SSS. Large seasonal biases remain in SMOS and Aquarius SSS. In order to look at the capability of satellite SSS to monitor spatial variability, especially at scales less than 300 km (not monitored with the Argo network), we first apply a monthly bias correction derived from satellite SSS and In Situ Analysis System (ISAS) SSS differences averaged over the studied region. Ship SSS averaged over 25 km is compared with satellite and ISAS SSS. Similar statistics are obtained for SMOS, Aquarius and ISAS products (root mean square error of about 0.15 and global correlation coefficient r of about 0.92). However, in the above statistics, SSS varies due to both large scale and mesoscale (here, for scales around 100 km) variability. In order to focus on mesoscale variability, we consider SSS anomalies with respect to a monthly climatology. SMOS SSS and Aquarius SSS anomalies are more significantly correlated (r > 0.5) to TSG SSS anomaly than ISAS. We show the effective gain of resolution and coverage provided by the satellite products over the interpolated in situ data. We also show the advantage of SMOS (r=0.57) over Aquarius (r=0.52) to reproduce SSS mesoscale features. PY 2014 PD DEC SO Journal Of Geophysical Research-oceans SN 0148-0027 PU Amer Geophysical Union VL 119 IS 12 UT 000348452800037 BP 8878 EP 8896 DI 10.1002/2013JC009610 ID 32150 ER EF