FN Archimer Export Format PT J TI Eddy response to Southern Ocean climate modes BT AF MORROW, R. WARD, Marshall L. HOGG, Andrew McC. PASQUET, S. AS 1:1;2:2;3:2;4:1; FF 1:;2:;3:;4:; C1 LEGOS CNRS, F-31401 Toulouse, France. Australian Natl Univ, Res Sch Earth Sci, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia. C2 LEGOS, FRANCE UNIV AUSTRALIAN NATL, AUSTRALIA IF 3.303 TC 33 UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00230/34157/33031.pdf LA English DT Article CR SURVOSTRAL 2000/2001 SURVOSTRAL 2001/2002 SURVOSTRAL 2002/2003 SURVOSTRAL 2003/2004 SURVOSTRAL 2004/2005 SURVOSTRAL 2005/2006 SURVOSTRAL 2006/2007 SURVOSTRAL 2007/2008 SURVOSTRAL 2008/2009 SURVOSTRAL 93 SURVOSTRAL 94 SURVOSTRAL 95 SURVOSTRAL 96 SURVOSTRAL 97 SURVOSTRAL 98 SURVOSTRAL 99 BO L'Astrolabe AB Interannual variations in Southern Ocean eddy kinetic energy (EKE) are investigated using 16 years of altimetric data. Circumpolar averages show a peak in EKE from 2000 to 2002, 2-3 years after the peak in the Southern Annular Mode (SAM) index. Although the SAM forcing is in phase around the circumpolar band, we find the EKE response varies regionally. The strongest EKE is in the Pacific, with energy peaks occurring progressively later toward the east. We suggest that this is due to the presence of two climate modes: SAM and ENSO. When strong positive SAM events coincide with La Nina periods, as in 1999, anomalous meridional wind forcing is enhanced in the South Pacific Ocean, contributing to the observed increase in EKE 2-3 years later. When positive SAM events coincide with El Nino periods, as in 1993, the climate modes are in opposition in the South Pacific, leading to a weak EKE response during the mid-1990s. Numerical modeling supports these observations. By applying different combinations of SAM and ENSO, we can reproduce both the elevated Pacific EKE response to SAM as well as an additional amplification/suppression of EKE during La Nina/El Nino. In general, we find that the EKE response depends on the interplay between wind forcing, topography, and mean flow and produces a strongly heterogeneous distribution in the Southern Ocean. PY 2010 PD OCT SO Journal Of Geophysical Research-oceans SN 0148-0227 PU Amer Geophysical Union VL 115 IS C10030 UT 000283091400001 BP 1 EP 12 DI 10.1029/2009JC005894 ID 34157 ER EF