FN Archimer Export Format
PT J
TI A triage approach to improve the relevance of marine ecosystem services assessments
BT 
AF PENDLETON, Linwood
   MONGRUEL, Remi
   BEAUMONT, Nicola
   HOOPER, Tara
   CHARLES, Mahe
AS 1:1,2;2:3;3:4;4:;5:5;
FF 1:;2:PDG-RBE-EM;3:;4:;5:;
C1 Univ Bretagne Occidentale, UMR AMURE, F-29238 Brest 3, France.
   Nicholas Inst Environm Policy Solut, Durham, NC 27708 USA.
   IFREMER, Ctr Bretagne, Marine Econ Unit, UMR AMURE, F-29280 Plouzane, France.
   Plymouth Marine Lab, Plymouth PL1 3DH, Devon, England.
   Agence Aires Marines Protegees, French Marine Protected Area Agcy, F-29229 Brest 2, France.
C2 UBO, FRANCE
   NICHOLAS INST ENVIRONM POLICY SOLUT, USA
   IFREMER, FRANCE
   PML, UK
   AGENCE AIRES MARINES PROTEGEES, FRANCE
SI BREST
SE PDG-RBE-EM
UM AMURE
IN WOS Ifremer jusqu'en 2018
   copubli-france
   copubli-europe
   copubli-univ-france
   copubli-int-hors-europe
IF 2.361
TC 24
UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00273/38421/36744.pdf
LA English
DT Article
DE ;Ecosystem services;Assessment;Marine planning;Marine protection
AB Ecosystem services assessments are increasingly being used to inform marine policy and planning. These assessments involve significant time, effort, and expertise. It is important at the outset to determine which of many ecosystem services should be quantified and which measures of ecological output, economic impact, or value should be assessed. Furthermore, the literature shows that in practice such assessments are unevenly applied and rarely used effectively in decision-making processes. We develop a structured decision-making approach, called a triage, to assess what types of ecosystem services should be assessed to improve the uptake and usefulness of such information in marine planning. Two case studies, in France and the United Kingdom, provide examples of the application of the triage approach.
PY 2015
PD JUL
SO Marine Ecology Progress Series
SN 0171-8630
PU Inter-research
VL 530
UT 000356938800014
BP 183
EP 193
DI 10.3354/meps11111
ID 38421
ER

EF