FN Archimer Export Format
PT J
TI SSU rDNA Divergence in Planktonic Foraminifera: Molecular Taxonomy and Biogeographic Implications
BT 
AF ANDRE, Aurore
   QUILLEVERE, Frederic
   MORARD, Raphael
   UJIIE, Yurika
   ESCARGUEL, Gilles
   DE VARGAS, Colomban
   DE GARIDEL-THORON, Thibault
   DOUADY, Christophe J.
AS 1:1,2;2:1;3:3;4:4;5:1;6:5;7:6;8:7,8;
FF 1:;2:;3:;4:;5:;6:;7:;8:;
C1 Univ Lyon 1, CNRS, Geol Lab, UMR 5276, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France.
   Univ Angers, CNRS, Lab Planetol & Geodynam Bioindicators Actuels & F, UMR 6112, Angers, France.
   Univ Bremen, Zentrum Marine Umweltwissensch MARUM, D-28359 Bremen, Germany.
   Shinshu Univ, Dept Biol, Matsumoto, Nagano 390, Japan.
   Univ Pierre & Marie Curie Stn Biolog Roscoff, CNRS, UMR 7144, Roscoff, France.
   Univ Aix Marseille 1, CNRS, Ctr Rech & DEnseignement Geosci IEnvironnem, F-13331 Marseille 3, France.
   Univ Lyon 1, CNRS, UMR 5023, F-69622 Villeurbanne, France.
   Inst Univ France, Paris, France.
C2 UNIV LYON, FRANCE
   UNIV ANGERS, FRANCE
   UNIV BREMEN, GERMANY
   UNIV SHINSHU, JAPAN
   UNIV PARIS 06, FRANCE
   UNIV AIX MARSEILLE, FRANCE
   UNIV LYON, FRANCE
   INST UNIV FRANCE, FRANCE
IN DOAJ
IF 3.234
TC 54
UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00290/40107/38859.pdf
   https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00290/40107/38860.pdf
   https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00290/40107/38861.xls
   https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00290/40107/38862.xlsx
   https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00290/40107/38863.zip
   https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00290/40107/38864.pdf
LA English
DT Article
CR GYRAFOR-A-2008
   OISO4 (VT 46)
   VT 114 / OISO-19
   VT 92 / GYRAFOR-B
BO Alis
   Marion Dufresne
AB The use of planktonic foraminifera in paleoceanography requires taxonomic consistency and precise assessment of the species biogeography. Yet, ribosomal small subunit (SSUr) DNA analyses have revealed that most of the modern morphospecies of planktonic foraminifera are composed of a complex of several distinct genetic types that may correspond to cryptic or pseudo-cryptic species. These genetic types are usually delimitated using partial sequences located at the 3'end of the SSUrDNA, but typically based on empirical delimitation. Here, we first use patristic genetic distances calculated within and among genetic types of the most common morpho-species to show that intra-type and inter-type genetic distances within morpho-species may significantly overlap, suggesting that genetic types have been sometimes inconsistently defined. We further apply two quantitative and independent methods, ABGD (Automatic Barcode Gap Detection) and GMYC (General Mixed Yule Coalescent) to a dataset of published and newly obtained partial SSU rDNA for a more objective assessment of the species status of these genetic types. Results of these complementary approaches are highly congruent and lead to a molecular taxonomy that ranks 49 genetic types of planktonic foraminifera as genuine (pseudo) cryptic species. Our results advocate for a standardized sequencing procedure allowing homogenous delimitations of (pseudo) cryptic species. On the ground of this revised taxonomic framework, we finally provide an integrative taxonomy synthesizing geographic, ecological and morphological differentiations that can occur among the genuine (pseudo) cryptic species. Due to molecular, environmental or morphological data scarcities, many aspects of our proposed integrative taxonomy are not yet fully resolved. On the other hand, our study opens up the potential for a correct interpretation of environmental sequence datasets.
PY 2014
PD AUG
SO Plos One
SN 1932-6203
PU Public Library Science
VL 9
IS 8
UT 000340900600073
BP 1
EP 19
DI 10.1371/journal.pone.0104641
ID 40107
ER

EF