FN Archimer Export Format PT J TI A comparative review of fisheries management experiences in the European Union and in other countries worldwide: Iceland, Australia, and New Zealand BT AF MARCHAL, Paul ANDERSEN, Jesper Levring ARANDA, Martin FITZPATRICK, Mike GOTI, Leyre GUYADER, Olivier HARALDSSON, Gunnar HATCHER, Aaron HEGLAND, Troels Jacob LE FLOC H, Pascal MACHER, Claire MALVAROSA, Loretta MARAVELIAS, Christos D. MARDLE, Simon MURILLAS, Arantza NIELSEN, J. Rasmus SABATELLA, Rosaria SMITH, Anthony D. M. STOKES, Kevin THOEGERSEN, Thomas ULRICH, Clara AS 1:1;2:2;3:3;4:4,5;5:6;6:7;7:8;8:9;9:10;10:11;11:7;12:12;13:13;14:2;15:3;16:14;17:12;18:15;19:16;20:14;21:14; FF 1:PDG-RBE-HMMN-RHBL;2:;3:;4:;5:;6:PDG-RBE-EM;7:;8:;9:;10:;11:PDG-RBE-EM;12:;13:;14:;15:;16:;17:;18:;19:;20:;21:; C1 IFREMER, Channel & North Sea Fisheries Res Unit, 150 Quai Gambetta,BP 699, F-62321 Boulogne S Mer, France. Univ Copenhagen, Dept Food & Resource Econ, Rolighedsvej 25, DK-1985 Frederiksberg C, Denmark. AZTI Tecnalia, Div Marine Res, E-20110 Gipuzkoa, Spain. Natl Univ Ireland, JE Cairnes Sch Business & Econ, Socioecon Marine Res Unit, Galway, Ireland. Irish Observer Net 3 Burton Pl, Gardiners Hill Cork, Ireland. Thunen Inst Sea Fisheries, Palmaille 9, D-22767 Hamburg, Germany. IFREMER, Maritime Econ Unit, CS 10070, F-29280 Plouzane, France. Univ Iceland, Inst Econ Studies, IS-101 Reykjavik, Iceland. Univ Portsmouth, Portsmouth Business Sch, Econ & Finance Dept, Richmond Bldg,Portland St, Portsmouth PO1 3DE, Hants, England. Aalborg Univ, Innovat Fisheries Management, Skibbrogade 5, DK-9000 Aalborg, Denmark. Univ Bretagne Occidentale, Unite Mixte Rech AMURE, 12 Rue Kergoat,Bat B,CS 93837, F-29238 Brest 3, France. NISEA Fishery & Aquaculture Res Org, Via Irno 11, I-84135 Salerno, SA, Italy. Hellen Ctr Marine Res, 46-7 Km Athens Sounio, Anavyssos 19013, Attica, Greece. Tech Univ Denmark, Inst Aquat Resources, Jaegersborg Alle 1, DK-2920 Charlottenlund, Denmark. CSIRO Oceans & Atmosphere, GPO Box 1538, Hobart, Tas 7109, Australia. 59 Jubilee Rd, Wellington 6035, New Zealand. C2 IFREMER, FRANCE UNIV COPENHAGEN, DENMARK AZTI, SPAIN UNIV NATL IRELAND, IRELAND IRISH OBSERVER NET, IRELAND THUNEN INST SEA FISHERIES, GERMANY IFREMER, FRANCE UNIV ICELAND, ICELAND UNIV PORTSMOUTH, UK UNIV AALBORG, DENMARK UBO, FRANCE NISEA FISHERY & AQUACULTURE RES ORG, ITALY HELLEN CTR MARINE RES, GREECE UNIV TECH DENMARK, DENMARK CSIRO, AUSTRALIA 59 Jubilee Rd, Wellington 6035, New Zealand. SI BOULOGNE BREST SE PDG-RBE-HMMN-RHBL PDG-RBE-EM UM AMURE IN WOS Ifremer jusqu'en 2018 copubli-france copubli-europe copubli-univ-france copubli-int-hors-europe IF 9.013 TC 48 UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00312/42305/41699.pdf LA English DT Article DE ;Australia;comparative review;European Union;fisheries management;Iceland;New Zealand AB This study compares the details and performance of fisheries management between the EU and a selection of other countries worldwide: Iceland, New Zealand, and Australia, which are considered in many respects to be among the most advanced in the world in fisheries management. Fisheries management in the EU, Iceland, Australia, and New Zealand has developed following different paths, despite being based on similar instruments and principles. Iceland, Australia, and New Zealand have been at the forefront of developing management practices such as stakeholder involvement, legally binding management targets (Australia, New Zealand), individual transferable quotas, and discard bans (Iceland, New Zealand). The EU has since the beginning of the 21st century taken significant steps to better involve stakeholders and establish quantitative targets through management plans, and a landing obligation is gradually being implemented from 2015 onward. The management of domestic fisheries resources in Australia, New Zealand, and Iceland has, overall, performed better than in the EU, in terms of conservation and economic efficiency. It should, however, be stressed that, compared to Australia, New Zealand, and Iceland, (i) initial over-capacity was more of an issue in the EU when management measures became legally binding and also that (ii) EU has been progressive in developing common enforcement standards, on stocks shared by sovereign nations. The situation of EU fisheries has substantially improved over the period 2004–2013 in the northeast Atlantic, with fishery status getting close to that in the other jurisdictions, but the lack of recovery for Mediterranean fish stocks remains a concern. PY 2016 PD SEP SO Fish And Fisheries SN 1467-2960 PU Wiley-blackwell VL 17 IS 3 UT 000382494600014 BP 803 EP 824 DI 10.1111/faf.12147 ID 42305 ER EF