FN Archimer Export Format PT J TI Aquaculture and marine protected areas: Potential opportunities and synergies BT AF LE GOUVELLO, Raphaela HOCHART, Laure-Elise LAFFOLEY, Dan SIMARD, Francois ANDRADE, Carlos ANGEL, Dror CALLIER, Myriam DE MONBRISON, David FEZZARDI, Davide HAROUN, Ricardo HARRIS, Alasdair HUGHES, Adam MASSA, Fabio ROQUE D'ORBCASTEL, Emmanuelle SOTO, Doris STEAD, Selina MARINO, Giovanna AS 1:1,2;2:2;3:3;4:2;5:4;6:5;7:6;8:7;9:8;10:9;11:10;12:11;13:12;14:6;15:13;16:14;17:15; FF 1:;2:;3:;4:;5:;6:;7:PDG-RBE-MARBEC-L3AS;8:;9:;10:;11:;12:;13:;14:PDG-ODE-LITTORAL-LERLR;15:;16:;17:; C1 STERMOR IUCN Expert & AMURE UBO, Paris, France. IUCN, Global Marine & Polar Programme, Gland, Switzerland. IUCN, World Commiss Protected Areas, Gland, Switzerland. Ctr Maricultura Calheta, Madeira, Portugal. Univ Haifa, Haifa, Israel. IFREMER, UMR MARBEC, F-34250 Palavas Les Flots, France. BRL Ingn, Nimes, France. Food & Agr Org United Nations, Rome, Italy. Univ Las Palmas Gran Canaria, ECOAQUA, Las Palmas Gran Canaria, Spain. Blue Ventures, London, England. SAMS, London, England. Food & Agr Org United Nations, Gen Fisheries Commiss Mediterranean, Rome, Italy. INCAR, Santiago, Chile. Newcastle Univ, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England. ISPRA, Rome, Italy. C2 UBO, FRANCE IUCN, SWITZERLAND IUCN, SWITZERLAND CTR MARICULTURA CALHETA, PORTUGAL UNIV HAIFA, ISRAEL IFREMER, FRANCE BRL INGN, FRANCE FAO, ITALY UNIV LAS PALMAS GRAN CANARIA, SPAIN BLUE VENTURES, UK SAMS, UK FAO, ITALY INCAR, CHILE UNIV NEWCASTLE, UK ISPRA, ITALY SI PALAVAS SETE SE PDG-RBE-MARBEC-L3AS PDG-ODE-LITTORAL-LERLR UM AMURE MARBEC IN WOS Ifremer jusqu'en 2018 copubli-france copubli-europe copubli-univ-france copubli-int-hors-europe copubli-sud IF 2.988 TC 33 UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00398/50969/51848.pdf LA English DT Article DE ;aquaculture;ecosystem approach;environmental impact assessment;littoral;marine protected area;ocean;sublittoral AB To meet the Convention on Biological Diversity's Aichi Target 11 on marine biodiversity protection and Aichi Target 6 on sustainable fisheries by 2020, as well as the Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 2 on food security and SDG 14 on oceans by 2030, there is an urgent need to rethink how best to reconcile nature conservation and sustainable development. This paper argues for effective governance to support processes that apply principles of sustainable development and an ecosystem approach to decide about economic activities at sea such as aquaculture. It describes opportunities, benefits and synergies between aquaculture and MPAs as a basis for wider debate. The scope is not a comprehensive analysis of aquaculture and MPAs, but rather to present examples of positive interactions between aquaculture activities and MPAs. The unintended negative consequences are also discussed to present balanced arguments. This work draws from four workshops held in 2015 and 2016 and used to collect information from about 100 experts representing various sectors and perspectives. It is recognized that aquaculture is an important activity in terms of sustainable development. It can play a role in providing food security, poverty alleviation and economic resilience, in particular for MPA local communities, and contribute to wild stock enhancement, as an alternative to overfishing and for providing services to the ecosystem. This study showed that there is a need from both aquaculture and MPA sides for clarity of objectives and willingness for open and extensive dialogue. The paper concludes by describing a number of tools and methods for supporting greater synergies between aquaculture and MPAs. The results from this work have already helped to build a common understanding between conservation and aquaculture and initiate a rapprochement for increasing synergies. PY 2017 PD SEP SO Aquatic Conservation-marine And Freshwater Ecosystems SN 1052-7613 PU Wiley VL 27 IS S1 UT 000409848000012 BP 138 EP 150 DI 10.1002/aqc.2821 ID 50969 ER EF