FN Archimer Export Format
PT J
TI Attraction and repulsion of mobile wild organisms to finfish and shellfish aquaculture: a review
BT 
AF CALLIER, Myriam
   BYRON, Carrie J.
   BENGTSON, David A.
   CRANFORD, Peter J.
   CROSS, Stephen F.
   FOCKEN, Ulfert
   JANSEN, Henrice M.
   KAMERMANS, Pauline
   KIESSLING, Anders
   LANDRY, Thomas
   O'BEIRN, Francis
   PETERSSON, Erik
   RHEAULT, Robert B.
   STRAND, Oivind
   SUNDELL, Kristina
   SVASAND, Terje
   WIKFORS, Gary H.
   MCKINDSEY, Christopher W.
AS 1:1;2:2;3:3;4:4;5:5;6:6;7:7,8;8:7;9:9;10:10;11:11;12:12;13:8;14:13;15:14;16:13;17:15;18:16;
FF 1:PDG-RBE-MARBEC-LAAAS;2:;3:;4:;5:;6:;7:;8:;9:;10:;11:;12:;13:;14:;15:;16:;17:;18:;
C1 Univ Montpellier, IFREMER, IRD, UMR MARBEC,CNRS, Palavas Les Flots, France.
   Univ New England, Marine Sci, Biddeford, ME USA.
   Univ Rhode Isl, Dept Fisheries Anim & Vet Sci, Kingston, RI 02881 USA.
   Fisheries & Oceans Canada, Bedford Inst Oceanog, Dartmouth, NS, Canada.
   Univ Victoria, Dept Geog, Victoria, BC, Canada.
   Thuenen Inst Fisheries Ecol, Ahrensburg Branch, Ahrensburg, Germany.
   Wageningen Marine Res, Shellfish Dept, Yerseke, Netherlands.
   Moonstone Oysters, Wakefield, RI USA.
   Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Uppsala, Sweden.
   Fisheries & Oceans Canada, Gulf Fisheries Ctr, Moncton, NB, Canada.
   Marine Inst, Galway, Ireland.
   Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Aquat Resources, Drottningholm, Sweden.
   Inst Marine Res, Bergen, Norway.
   Univ Gothenburg, SWEMARC, Swedish Mariculture Res Ctr, Gothenburg, Sweden.
   NOAA, Fisheries Serv, Milford, CT USA.
   Fisheries & Oceans Canada, Maurice Lamontagne Inst, POB 1000, Mont Joli, PQ G5H 3Z4, Canada.
C2 IFREMER, FRANCE
   UNIV NEW ENGLAND, USA
   UNIV RHODE ISL, USA
   MPO BEDFORD INST OCEANOG, CANADA
   UNIV VICTORIA, CANADA
   THUENEN INST FISHERIES ECOL, GERMANY
   WAGENINGEN MARINE RES, NETHERLANDS
   MOONSTONE OYSTERS, USA
   UNIV UPSALLA SLU, SWEDEN
   MPO, CANADA
   MARINE INST, IRELAND
   UNIV UPSALLA SLU, SWEDEN
   IMR (BERGEN), NORWAY
   UNIV GOTHENBURG, SWEDEN
   NOAA, USA
   MPO INST MAURICE LAMONTAGNE, CANADA
SI PALAVAS
SE PDG-RBE-MARBEC-LAAAS
UM MARBEC
IN WOS Ifremer jusqu'en 2018
   copubli-europe
   copubli-int-hors-europe
IF 7.19
TC 95
UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00406/51737/52435.pdf
LA English
DT Article
DE ;aquaculture;artificial reefs;attraction;farm waste;fish aggregating devices;repulsion;wild population
AB Knowledge of aquaculture–environment interactions is essential for the development of a sustainable aquaculture industry and efficient marine spatial planning. The effects of fish and shellfish farming on sessile wild populations, particularly infauna, have been studied intensively. Mobile fauna, including crustaceans, fish, birds and marine mammals, also interact with aquaculture operations, but the interactions are more complex and these animals may be attracted to (attraction) or show an aversion to (repulsion) farm operations with various degrees of effects. This review outlines the main mechanisms and effects of attraction and repulsion of wild animals to/from marine finfish cage and bivalve aquaculture, with a focus on effects on fisheries-related species. Effects considered in this review include those related to the provision of physical structure (farm infrastructure acting as fish aggregating devices (FADs) or artificial reefs (ARs), the provision of food (e.g. farmed animals, waste feed and faeces, fouling organisms associated with farm structures) and some farm activities (e.g. boating, cleaning). The reviews show that the distribution of mobile organisms associated with farming structures varies over various spatial (vertical and horizontal) and temporal scales (season, feeding time, day/night period). Attraction/repulsion mechanisms have a variety of direct and indirect effects on wild organisms at the level of individuals and populations and may have implication for the management of fisheries species and the ecosystem in the context of marine spatial planning. This review revealed considerable uncertainties regarding the long-term and ecosystem-wide consequences of these interactions. The use of modelling may help better understand consequences, but long-term studies are necessary to better elucidate effects. 
PY 2018
PD DEC
SO Reviews In Aquaculture
SN 1753-5123
PU Wiley
VL 10
IS 4
UT 000449886700008
BP 924
EP 949
DI 10.1111/raq.12208
ID 51737
ER

EF