FN Archimer Export Format PT J TI Strong winds in a coupled wave-atmosphere model during a North Atlantic storm event: evaluation against observations BT AF PINEAU-GUILLOU, Lucia ARDHUIN, Fabrice BOUIN, Marie-Noelle REDELSPERGER, Jean-Luc CHAPRON, Bertrand BIDLOT, Jean-Raymond QUILFEN, Yves AS 1:1;2:1;3:1,2,3;4:1;5:1;6:4;7:1; FF 1:PDG-ODE-LOPS-OC;2:;3:;4:;5:PDG-ODE-LOPS-SIAM;6:;7:PDG-ODE-LOPS-SIAM; C1 UBO, IFREMER, CNRS, IRD,LOPS,UMR 6523,IUEM, Plouzane, France. Meteo France, CNRM, UMR 3589, Toulouse, France. CNRS, Toulouse, France. European Ctr Medium Range Weather Forecasts, Reading, Berks, England. C2 IFREMER, FRANCE CNRM (METEO FRANCE), FRANCE CNRS, FRANCE ECMWF, UK SI BREST SE PDG-ODE-LOPS-OC PDG-ODE-LOPS-SIAM UM LOPS IN WOS Ifremer jusqu'en 2018 copubli-france copubli-europe IF 3.198 TC 26 UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00410/52118/52826.pdf LA English DT Article DE ;air-sea exchanges;northeast Atlantic;winds;IFS;sea state;roughness length;drag coefficient;wind stress AB Strong winds may be biased in atmospheric models. Here the ECMWF coupled wave-atmosphere model is used (1) to evaluate strong winds against observations, (2) to test how alternative wind stress parameterizations could lead to a more accurate model. For the period of storms Kaat and Lilli (23 to 27 January 2014), we compared simulated winds with in-situ – moored buoys and platforms - and satellite observations available from the North Atlantic. Five wind stress parameterizations were evaluated. The first result is that moderate simulated winds (5-20 m s-1) match with all observations. However, for strong winds (above 20 m s-1), mean differences appear, as much as -7 m s-1 at 30 m s-1. Significant differences also exist between observations, with buoys and ASCAT-KNMI generally showing lower wind speeds than the platforms and other remote sensing data used in this study (AMSR2, ASCAT-RSS, WindSat, SMOS and JASON-2). It is difficult to conclude which dataset should be used as a reference. Even so, buoy and ASCAT-KNMI winds are likely to underestimate the real wind speed. The second result is that common wave-age dependent parameterizations produce unrealistic drags and are not appropriate for coupling, whereas a newly empirically-adjusted Charnock parameterization leads to higher winds compared to the default ECMWF parameterization. This proposed new parameterization may lead to more accurate results in an operational context. PY 2018 PD JAN SO Quarterly Journal Of The Royal Meteorological Society SN 0035-9009 PU Wiley VL 144 IS 711 Part.B UT 000428462300002 BP 317 EP 332 DI 10.1002/qj.3205 ID 52118 ER EF