FN Archimer Export Format
PT J
TI Ocean Futures Under Ocean Acidification, Marine Protection, and Changing Fishing Pressures Explored Using a Worldwide Suite of Ecosystem Models
BT 
AF OLSEN, Erik
   KAPLAN, Isaac C.
   AINSWORTH, Cameron
   FAY, Gavin
   GAICHAS, Sarah
   GAMBLE, Robert
   GIRARDIN, Raphael
   EIDE, Cecilie H.
   IHDE, Thomas F.
   MORZARIA-LUNA, Hem Nalini
   JOHNSON, Kelli F.
   SAVINA-ROLLAND, Marie
   TOWNSEND, Howard
   WEIJERMAN, Mariska
   FULTON, Elizabeth A.
   LINK, Jason S.
AS 1:1;2:2;3:3;4:4;5:5;6:5;7:6;8:1;9:7;10:8,9,10;11:11;12:12;13:13;14:14;15:15,16;16:17;
FF 1:;2:;3:;4:;5:;6:;7:PDG-RBE-HMMN-LRHBL;8:;9:;10:;11:;12:PDG-RBE-STH-LTBH;13:;14:;15:;16:;
C1 Inst Marine Res, Bergen, Norway.
   NOAA, Conservat Biol Div, Northwest Fisheries Sci Ctr, Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, Seattle, WA USA.
   Univ S Florida, Coll Marine Sci, St Petersburg, FL USA.
   Univ Massachusetts Dartmouth, Sch Marine Sci & Technol, Dept Fisheries Oceanog, New Bedford, MA USA.
   NOAA, NMFS, Northeast Fisheries Sci Ctr, Woods Hole, MA USA.
   NOAA, Long Live Kings, Northwest Fisheries Sci Ctr, Natl Manne Fisheries Serv, Seattle, WA USA.
   Morgan State Univ, PEARL, St Leonard, MD USA.
   CEDO Intercultural, Tucson, AZ USA.
   CEDO Intercultural, Puerto Penasco, Mexico.
   NOAA, Northwest Resource Anal & Monitoring Div, Northwest Fisheries Sci Ctr, Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, Seattle, WA USA.
   NOAA, Fishery Resource Anal & Monitoring Div, Northwest Fisheries Sci Ctr, Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, Seattle, WA USA.
   French Res Inst Exploitat Sea, Brest, France.
   Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, Cooperat Oxford Lab, Off Sci & Technol, Oxford, MD USA.
   NOAA, Ecosyst Sci Div, Pacific Isl Fisheries Sci Ctr, Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, Honolulu, HI USA.
   CSIRO Oceans & Atmosphere, Hobart, Tas, Australia.
   Univ Tasmania, Ctr Marine Socioecol, Hobart, Tas, Australia.
   NOAA, Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, Woods Hole, MA 02543 USA.
C2 IMR (BERGEN), NORWAY
   NOAA, USA
   UNIV S FLORIDA, USA
   UNIV MASSACHUSETTS DARTMOUTH, USA
   NOAA, USA
   NOAA, USA
   UNIV MORGAN STATE, USA
   CEDO INTERCULTURAL, USA
   CEDO INTERCULTURAL, MEXICO
   NOAA, USA
   NOAA, USA
   IFREMER, FRANCE
   NOAA, USA
   NOAA, USA
   CSIRO, AUSTRALIA
   UNIV TASMANIA, AUSTRALIA
   NOAA, USA
SI BOULOGNE
   LORIENT
SE PDG-RBE-HMMN-LRHBL
   PDG-RBE-STH-LTBH
IN WOS Ifremer jusqu'en 2018
   DOAJ
   copubli-europe
   copubli-int-hors-europe
   copubli-sud
IF 5.247
TC 39
UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00428/53948/55094.pdf
   https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00428/53948/55095.pdf
LA English
DT Article
DE ;ecosystem-based management;fisheries management;ocean acidification;marine protected areas;Atlantis ecosystem model
AB Ecosystem-based management (EBM) of the ocean considers all impacts on and uses of marine and coastal systems. In recent years, there has been a heightened interest in EBM tools that allow testing of alternative management options and help identify tradeoffs among human uses. End-to-end ecosystem modeling frameworks that consider a wide range of management options are a means to provide integrated solutions to the complex ocean management problems encountered in EBM. Here, we leverage the global advances in ecosystem modeling to explore common opportunities and challenges for ecosystem-based management, including changes in ocean acidification, spatial management, and fishing pressure across eight Atlantis (atlantis.cmar.csiro.au) end-to-end ecosystem models. These models represent marine ecosystems from the tropics to the arctic, varying in size, ecology, and management regimes, using a three-dimensional, spatially-explicit structure parametrized for each system. Results suggest stronger impacts from ocean acidification and marine protected areas than from altering fishing pressure, both in terms of guild-level (i.e., aggregations of similar species or groups) biomass and in terms of indicators of ecological and fishery structure. Effects of ocean acidification were typically negative (reducing biomass), while marine protected areas led to both “winners” and “losers” at the level of particular species (or functional groups). Changing fishing pressure (doubling or halving) had smaller effects on the species guilds or ecosystem indicators than either ocean acidification or marine protected areas. Compensatory effects within guilds led to weaker average effects at the guild level than the species or group level. The impacts and tradeoffs implied by these future scenarios are highly relevant as ocean governance shifts focus from single-sector objectives (e.g., sustainable levels of individual fished stocks) to taking into account competing industrial sectors' objectives (e.g., simultaneous spatial management of energy, shipping, and fishing) while at the same time grappling with compounded impacts of global climate change (e.g., ocean acidification and warming). 
PY 2018
PD MAR
SO Frontiers In Marine Science
SN 2296-7745
PU Frontiers Media Sa
VL 5
IS 64
UT 000456932700001
DI 10.3389/fmars.2018.00064
ID 53948
ER

EF