FN Archimer Export Format
PT J
TI A Global Mitigation Hierarchy for Nature Conservation
BT 
AF ARLIDGE, William N. S.
   BULL, Joseph W.
   ADDISON, Prue F. E.
   BURGASS, Michael J.
   GIANUCA, Dimas
   GORHAM, Taylor M.
   JACOB, Celine
   SHUMWAY, Nicole
   SINCLAIR, Samuel P.
   WATSON, James E. M.
   WILCOX, Chris
   MILNER-GULLAND, E. J.
AS 1:1;2:3,4,5;3:1;4:2;5:6;6:7;7:8;8:9,10;9:2;10:9,10,11;11:12;12:1;
FF 1:;2:;3:;4:;5:;6:;7:PDG-RBE-EM;8:;9:;10:;11:;12:;
C1 Univ Oxfords, Dept Zool, Oxford, England.
   Imperial Coll London, Dept Life Sci, London, England.
   Univ Kent, Durrell Inst Conservat & Ecol, Canterbury, Kent, England.
   Univ Copenhagen, Dept Food & Resource Econ, Copenhagen, Denmark.
   Univ Copenhagen, Ctr Macroecol Evolut & Climate, Copenhagen, Denmark.
   Univ Exeter, Environm & Sustainabil Inst, Penryn, England.
   Marine Stewardship Council, London, England.
   IFREMER, UMR AMURE, Brest, France.
   Sch Earth & Environm Sci, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
   Ctr Biodivers & Conservat Sci, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
   Wildlife Conservat Soc, Sci & Res Initiat, Bronx, NY USA.
   CSIRO, Oceans & Atmosphere Business Unit, Hobart, Tas, Australia.
C2 UNIV OXFORDS, UK
   IMPERIAL COLL LONDON, UK
   UNIV KENT, UK
   UNIV COPENHAGEN, DENMARK
   UNIV COPENHAGEN, DENMARK
   UNIV EXETER, UK
   MARINE STEWARDSHIP COUNCIL, UK
   IFREMER, FRANCE
   UNIV QUEENSLAND, AUSTRALIA
   UNIV QUEENSLAND, AUSTRALIA
   WILDLIFE CONSERVAT SOC, USA
   CSIRO, AUSTRALIA
SI BREST
SE PDG-RBE-EM
UM AMURE
IN WOS Ifremer jusqu'en 2018
   copubli-europe
   copubli-int-hors-europe
IF 6.591
TC 119
UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00442/55323/56831.pdf
LA English
DT Article
DE ;adequacy;biodiversity;development;no net loss;sustainability
AB Efforts to conserve biodiversity comprise a patchwork of international goals, national-level plans, and local interventions that, overall, are failing. We discuss the potential utility of applying the mitigation hierarchy, widely used during economic development activities, to all negative human impacts on biodiversity. Evaluating all biodiversity losses and gains through the mitigation hierarchy could help prioritize consideration of conservation goals and drive the empirical evaluation of conservation investments through the explicit consideration of counterfactual trends and ecosystem dynamics across scales. We explore the challenges in using this framework to achieve global conservation goals, including operationalization and monitoring and compliance, and we discuss solutions and research priorities. The mitigation hierarchy's conceptual power and ability to clarify thinking could provide the step change needed to integrate the multiple elements of conservation goals and interventions in order to achieve successful biodiversity outcomes. 
PY 2018
PD MAY
SO Bioscience
SN 0006-3568
PU Oxford Univ Press
VL 68
IS 5
UT 000432173000005
BP 336
EP 347
DI 10.1093/biosci/biy029
ID 55323
ER

EF