FN Archimer Export Format
PT J
TI Maximum Economic Yield Fishery Management in the Face of Global Warming
BT 
AF DIOP, Bassirou
   SANZ, Nicolas
   JUNIOR DUPLAN, Yves Jamont
   GUENE, El Hadji Mama
   BLANCHARD, Fabian
   PEREAU, Jean-Christophe
   DOYEN, Luc
AS 1:1;2:2;3:3;4:4;5:5;6:6;7:6;
FF 1:;2:;3:;4:;5:PDG-RBE-BIODIVHAL;6:;7:;
C1 CNRS French Natl Ctr Sci Res, LEEISA, UMRS 3456, BP 477, Cayenne 9733, French Guiana.
   Univ French Guiana, UMRS 3456, LEEISA, Campus Troubiran,BP 20792, Cayenne 97337, French Guiana.
   Univ French Guiana, Campus Troubiran,BP 20792, Cayenne 97337, French Guiana.
   IPR, Rennes, France.
   Ifremer French Res Inst Exploitat Sea, LEEISA, UMRS 3456, BP 477, Cayenne 97331, French Guiana.
   Univ Bordeaux, GREThA CNRS French Natl Ctr Sci Res, Ave Leon Duguit, F-33608 Pessac, France.
C2 CNRS, FRANCE
   UNIV GUYANE, FRANCE
   UNIV GUYANE, FRANCE
   UNIV RENNES, FRANCE
   IFREMER, FRANCE
   UNIV BORDEAUX, FRANCE
SI GUYANE
SE PDG-RBE-BIODIVHAL
UM LEEISA
IN WOS Ifremer jusqu'en 2018
   copubli-france
   copubli-univ-france
IF 4.281
TC 15
UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00453/56418/58115.pdf
LA English
DT Article
DE ;Renewable resources;Fishery bioeconomic model;Climate change;Climate scenarios;Adaptation;Shrimp
AB This paper deals with fishery management in the face of the ecological and economic effects of global warming. To achieve this, a dynamic bioeconomic model and model-based scenarios are considered, in which the stock's growth function depends on the sea surface temperature. The model is empirically calibrated for the French Guiana shrimp fishery using time series collected over the period 1993–2009. Three fishing effort strategies are then compared under two contrasted IPCC climate scenarios (RCP 8.5 and RCP 2.6). A first harvesting strategy maintains the Status Quo in terms of fishing effort. A more ecologically-oriented strategy based on the closure of the fishery is also considered. A third strategy, which relates to Maximum Economic Yield (MEY), is based on the optimisation of the net present value derived from fishing. The results first show that ‘Status Quo’ fishing intensity combined with global warming leads to the collapse of the fishery in the long run. Secondly, it turns out that the Closure strategy preserves stock viability especially under the optimistic climate scenario. Thirdly, the MEY strategy makes it possible to satisfy bioeconomic performances requirements with positive stock and profit, once again, especially under the optimistic warming scenario. Consequently, MEY emerges as a relevant bioeconomic strategy in terms of adaptation to climate change but only in connection with climate change mitigation. 
PY 2018
PD DEC
SO Ecological Economics
SN 0921-8009
PU Elsevier Science Bv
VL 154
UT 000446282700006
BP 52
EP 61
DI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2018.07.027
ID 56418
ER

EF