FN Archimer Export Format
PT CHAP
TI Potential Economic Consequences of the Landing Obligation
BT The European Landing Obligation, S. S. Uhlmann et al. (eds.), 2018. ISBN 978-3-030-03307-1 ISBN 978-3-030-03308-8 (eBook) https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-03308-8.Chap.6, pp.109-128
AF Hoff, Ayoe
   Frost, Hans
   Andersen, Peder
   Prellezo, Raul
   Rueda, Lucia
   Triantaphyllidis, George
   Argyrou, Ioanna
   Tsikliras, Athanassios
   Motova, Arina
   LEHUTA, Sigrid
   Curtis, Hazel
   Rodriguez-Rodriguez, Gonzalo
   Ballesteros, Hugo M
   Valeiras, Julio
   Bellido, José Maria
AS 1:1;2:1;3:1;4:2;5:3;6:4;7:4;8:5;9:6;10:7;11:6;12:8;13:8;14:9;15:10;
FF 1:;2:;3:;4:;5:;6:;7:;8:;9:;10:PDG-RBE-EMH;11:;12:;13:;14:;15:;
C1 Department of Food and Resource Economics (IFRO), University of Copenhagen, Frederiksberg C, Denmark
   AZTI, Sukarrieta, BIZKAIA, Spain
   Centro Oceanográfico de Baleares, Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Palma, Spain
   NAYS Ltd., Kallithea, Athens
   Laboratory of Ichthyology, School of Biology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki University Campus, Thessaloniki, Greece
   Seafish, Edinburgh, UK
   Ifremer, Fisheries Ecol & Modelling Unit, Nantes, France
   Fisheries Economics and Natural Resources Research Unit, Department of Applied Economics, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, University of Santiago, Santiago de Compostela, A Coruña, Spain
   Instituto Español de Oceanografía (IEO), Centro Oceanográfico de Vigo, Vigo, Spain
   Instituto Español de Oceanografía, Centro Oceanográfico de Murcia (IEO), San Pedro del Pinatar, Murcia, Spain
C2 UNIV COPENHAGEN, DENMARK
   AZTI, SPAIN
   IEO, SPAIN
   NAYS LTD., ATHENS
   UNIV THESSALONIKI, GREECE
   SEAFISH, UK
   IFREMER, FRANCE
   UNIV SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA, SPAIN
   IEO, SPAIN
   IEO, SPAIN
SI NANTES
SE PDG-RBE-EMH
UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00473/58435/61010.pdf
LA English
DT Book section
DE ;Costs and earnings;Discards;Economic repercussions;Fisheries management;Fleet adjustment
AB To assess the likely economic outcomes to fishing fleets of the Landing Obligation (LO), bioeconomic models covering seven European fisheries, ranging from the North East Atlantic to the Mediterranean, have been applied to estimate the economic performance of fleets before and after implementing the LO. It is shown that for most of the analysed fisheries, their economic outcome will be negatively affected in the long term by the LO, when compared to the expected outcome with no LO. Efficient mitigation strategies (exemptions, quota uplifts, improved selectivity, effort reallocation and others) may, for some of the analysed fisheries, reduce the negative economic effect of the LO. Moreover, the possibility to trade quotas, both nationally and internationally, may also reduce the economic losses caused by the LO. However, even with mitigation strategies and/or quota trade in place, most of the analysed fisheries are worse off under the LO than what could be expected if the LO was not implemented. 
PY 2018
DI 10.1007/978-3-030-03308-8_6
ID 58435
ER

EF