FN Archimer Export Format
PT J
TI From no whinge scenarios to viability tree
BT 
AF Doyen, L.
   Armstrong, C.
   Baumgärtner, S.
   Béné, Christophe
   Blanchard, Fabian
   Cissé, Abdoul
   Cooper, Rachel
   Dutra, L.X.C.
   Eide, A.
   Freitas, D.
   Gourguet, Sophie
   Gusmao, F.
   Hardy, P.-Y.
   Jarre, A.
   Little, L.R.
   Macher, Claire
   Quaas, M.
   Regnier, E.
   Sanz, N.
   Thébaud, Olivier
AS 1:1;2:2;3:3;4:4;5:5;6:5;7:1;8:6,10;9:2,9,13,14;10:7;11:9,10;12:8;13:1;14:6;15:11;16:10;17:12;18:1,10;19:5,15;20:9,10;
FF 1:;2:;3:;4:;5:PDG-RBE-BIODIVHAL;6:PDG-RBE-BIODIVHAL;7:PDG-RBE-EM;8:;9:;10:;11:PDG-RBE-EM;12:;13:;14:;15:;16:PDG-RBE-EM;17:;18:;19:;20:PDG-RBE-EM;
C1 GREThA, CNRS, University of Bordeaux, Pessac, France
   UiT, Norwegian College of Fishery Science, University Tromsoe, Tromsoe, Norway
   Environmental Economics and Resource Management, University of Friburg, Germany
   CIAT, Decision and Policy Analysis Program, Cali, Colombia
   LEEISA, UMR IFREMER-CNRS-University of Cayenne, French Guiana, France
   MARE Institute, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
   State University of São Paulo, UNESP, Coastal Campus, Sao Vicente, Brazil
   FAPESP & Instituto do Mar, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Santos, Brazil
   CSIRO, Oceans and Atmosphere, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
   IFREMER, UMR AMURE, Département d'Economie Maritime, Plouzané, France
   CSIRO, Oceans and Atmosphere, Hobart, TAS, Australia
   Department of Economics and iDiv, University of Leipzig, Germany
   School of Marine Studies, The University of the South Pacific, Suva, Fiji Islands
   Centre for Marine Socioecology, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
C2 UNIV BORDEAUX, FRANCE
   UNIV TROMSO, NORWAY
   UNIV FRIBOURG, GERMANY
   CIAT, COLOMBIA
   IFREMER, FRANCE
   UNIV CAPE TOWN, SOUTH AFRICA
   UNIV SAO PAULO, BRAZIL
   UNIV FED SAO PAULO, BRAZIL
   CSIRO, AUSTRALIA
   IFREMER, FRANCE
   CSIRO, AUSTRALIA
   UNIV LEIPZIG, GERMANY
   UNIV SOUTH PACIFIC, FIJI
   UNIV TASMANIA, AUSTRALIA
   UNIV GUYANE, FRANCE
SI GUYANE
   BREST
SE PDG-RBE-BIODIVHAL
   PDG-RBE-EM
UM AMURE
   LEEISA
IN WOS Ifremer UMR
   WOS Cotutelle UMR
   copubli-france
   copubli-europe
   copubli-univ-france
   copubli-int-hors-europe
   copubli-sud
IF 4.482
TC 10
UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00501/61243/84536.pdf
LA English
DT Article
DE ;Minimal whinge;Safe operating space;Scenarios;Ecological economics;Modeling;Sustainability;Viability kernel
AB Avoiding whinges from various and potentially conflicting stakeholders is a major challenge for sustainable development and for the identification of sustainability scenarios or policies for biodiversity and ecosystem services. It turns out that independently complying with whinge thresholds and constraints of these stakeholders is not sufficient because dynamic ecological-economic interactions and uncertainties occur. Thus more demanding no whinge standards are needed. In this paper, we first argue that these new boundaries can be endogenously exhibited with the mathematical concepts of viability kernel and viable controls. Second, it is shown how these no whinge kernels have components, such as harvesting of resources, that should remain within safe corridor while some other components, in particular biodiversity, have only lower conservation limits. Thus, using radar charts, we show how this no whinge kernels can take the shape of a tree that we name viability tree. These trees of viability capture the idea that the unbounded renewal potential of biodiversity combined with a bounded use of the different ecosystem services are crucial ingredients for the sustainability of socio-ecosystems and the design of no whinge policies reconciling the different stakeholders involved. 
PY 2019
PD SEP
SO Ecological Economics
SN 0921-8009
PU Elsevier BV
VL 163
UT 000474329600019
BP 183
EP 188
DI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.04.011
ID 61243
ER

EF