FN Archimer Export Format
PT J
TI Should Gonyaulax hyalina and Gonyaulax fragilis (Dinophyceae) remain two different taxa?
BT 
AF Carbonell-Moore, M. Consuelo
   Mertens, Kenneth
AS 1:1;2:2;
FF 1:;2:PDG-ODE-LITTORAL-LERBO;
C1 Department of Botany and Plant Pathology, College of Agricultural Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331-2902, USA
   Ifremer, LER BO, Station de Biologie Marine, Place de la Croix, BP 40537, Concarneau Cedex F-29185, France
C2 UNIV OREGON STATE, USA
   IFREMER, FRANCE
SI CONCARNEAU
SE PDG-ODE-LITTORAL-LERBO
IN WOS Ifremer UPR
   copubli-int-hors-europe
IF 2.276
TC 11
UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00516/62786/67616.pdf
LA English
DT Article
DE ;Anterior sulcal plate;Gonyaulax polygramma;Misidentification
AB Escalera et al. (2018. Phycologia 57: 453–464) concluded that Gonyaulax hyalina and G. fragilis were the same species. Here, the morphologies of G. hyalina and G. fragilis were restudied in field samples from different parts of the World Ocean. Results showed that Escalera et al. did not observe G. fragilis, as all strains used in their study belong to one species, G. hyalina. In consequence, it is hereby proposed that the two taxa remain as separate species until further genetic studies are carried out. Additionally, the interpretation of the anterior sulcal plate as unique within gonyaulacoids is considered here inaccurate, as the plate pattern of both species is similar to other species of Gonyaulax, e.g. G. polygramma. We also show that both species may co-occur in the same sample. Their observation of an anterior intercalary plate in cultures of G. hyalina was confirmed in field samples. 
PY 2019
SO Phycologia
SN 0031-8884
PU Informa UK Limited
VL 58
IS 6
UT 000490983300001
BP 685
EP 689
DI 10.1080/00318884.2019.1663477
ID 62786
ER

EF