Improved estimation of discard mortality rates with in situ experiments involving electronic and traditional tagging

Type Article
Date 2020-01
Language English
Author(s) Benoît Hugues P.1, Morfin MarieORCID2, Capizzano Connor W.3, 4
Affiliation(s) 1 : Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Maurice Lamontagne Institute, Mont Joli, QC, G5H 3Z4, Canada
2 : IFREMER, Unité de Sciences et Technologies halieutiques, Laboratoire de Technologie et Biologie Halieutique, F-56100, Lorient, France
3 : Anderson Cabot Center for Ocean Life, New England Aquarium, Boston, MA, 02125, USA
4 : School for the Environment, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, 02125, USA
Source Fisheries Research (0165-7836) (Elsevier BV), 2020-01 , Vol. 221 , P. 105398 (12p.)
DOI 10.1016/j.fishres.2019.105398
WOS© Times Cited 4
Keyword(s) Catch and release mortality, Electronic tagging, Capture-mark-recapture tagging, Parametric survival modelling, Integrated modelling

Reliable estimates of release or discard mortality (DM) rates for recreational and commercial fisheries are necessary for robust assessment of the effects of fishing on populations and for establishing effective regulatory measures concerning the release of fish. In situ experiments involving the tagging of released fish are most likely to produce accurate estimates given that experimental subjects are captured and released under representative fishery conditions. Data from electronic tags can be used to infer movement or behavioral patterns of released fish, from which mortality times can be derived to then estimate natural mortality and DM rates. However, resulting DM rate estimates are often of low precision (high variance) due to small sample sizes associated with the elevated cost of electronic tags. Alternatively, returns of traditional tags from small scale experiments constitute a relatively inexpensive means of estimating the relative DM rates of two or more groups (e.g., vitality or injury classes, capture methods) of released fish. Combining the two approaches when there are two or more groups of discarded individuals can be beneficial. First, results from the two methods can be used to assess whether experimental effects such as tag-related mortality could bias estimates of DM rates. Second, we propose a modelling approach that integrates data from these two types of tagging methods to produce absolute DM rate estimates that can be more precise than those obtained from electronic tagging alone. We show using simulations under which conditions precision is improved and how different allocations of effort to electronic and traditional tagging can be used to plan DM experiments with respect to the precision of estimates and cost. An example based on a recent study is presented to illustrate the application of the proposed approach.

Full Text
File Pages Size Access
12 5 MB Access on demand
Author's final draft 25 1 MB Open access
Top of the page