FN Archimer Export Format
PT J
TI Replicated anthropogenic hybridisations reveal parallel patterns of admixture in marine mussels
BT 
AF Simon, Alexis
   Arbiol, Christine
   Nielsen, Einar Eg
   Couteau, Jérôme
   Sussarellu, Rossana
   Burgeot, Thierry
   Bernard, Ismaël
   Coolen, Joop W. P.
   Lamy, Jean-Baptiste
   ROBERT, Stephane
   Skazina, Maria
   Strelkov, Petr
   Queiroga, Henrique
   Cancio, Ibon
   Welch, John J.
   Viard, Frédérique
   Bierne, Nicolas
AS 1:1;2:1;3:2;4:3;5:4;6:4;7:5;8:6,7;9:8;10:8;11:9,10;12:9,10;13:11;14:12;15:13;16:14;17:1;
FF 1:;2:;3:;4:;5:PDG-RBE-BE-LEX;6:PDG-RBE-BE;7:;8:;9:PDG-RBE-SGMM-LGPMM;10:PDG-ODE-LITTORAL-LERPC;11:;12:;13:;14:;15:;16:;17:;
C1 ISEM Univ Montpellier CNRS EPHE IRD Montpellier, France
   Section for Marine Living Resources National Institute of Aquatic Resources Technical University of Denmark Silkeborg, Denmark
   SARL TOXEM Le Havre, France
   Ifremer Unité Biogéochimie et Écotoxicologie Centre Atlantique Nantes, France
   SAS Eurêka Mer Lézardrieux, France
   Wageningen Marine Research Den Helder, The Netherlands
   Aquatic Ecology and Water Quality Management Group Wageningen University Wageningen ,the Netherlands
   SG2M‐LGPMM Laboratoire de Génétique et Pathologie des Mollusques Marins Ifremer La Tremblade ,France
   St. Petersburg State University St. Petersburg, Russia
   Laboratory of Monitoring and Conservation of Natural Arctic Ecosystems Murmansk Arctic State University Murmansk, Russia
   Department of Biology & CESAM University of Aveiro Aveiro, Portugal
   CBET Research Group Department of Zoology and Animal Cell Biology Faculty Science and Technology and Research Centre for Experimental Marine Biology and Biotechnology (PiE‐UPV/EHU) University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU) Bilbao ,Spain
   Department of Genetics University of Cambridge Cambridge, UK
   Department AD2M UPMC Univ Paris 06 CNRS UMR 7144 Station Biologique Sorbonne Universités, Roscoff ,France
C2 UNIV MONTPELLIER, FRANCE
   UNIV TECH DENMARK (DTU AQUA), DENMARK
   SARL TOXEM, FRANCE
   IFREMER, FRANCE
   EUREKA, FRANCE
   UNIV WAGENINGEN, NETHERLANDS
   UNIV WAGENINGEN, NETHERLANDS
   IFREMER, FRANCE
   UNIV ST PETERSBURG STATE, RUSSIA
   UNIV MURMANSK, RUSSIA
   UNIV AVEIRO, PORTUGAL
   UNIV PAIS VASCO EHU, SPAIN
   UNIV CAMBRIDGE, UK
   CNRS, FRANCE
SI NANTES
   LA TREMBLADE
SE PDG-RBE-BE-LEX
   PDG-RBE-BE
   PDG-RBE-SGMM-LGPMM
   PDG-ODE-LITTORAL-LERPC
IN WOS Ifremer UPR
   DOAJ
   copubli-france
   copubli-europe
   copubli-univ-france
   copubli-int-hors-europe
IF 5.183
TC 36
UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00594/70600/68791.pdf
   https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00594/70600/68792.pdf
LA English
DT Article
DE ;admixture;bentho-pelagic species;biological introductions;clines;ports;secondary contact
AB Human‐mediated transport creates secondary contacts between genetically differentiated lineages, bringing new opportunities for gene exchange. When similar introductions occur in different places, they provide informally replicated experiments for studying hybridisation. We here examined 4,279 Mytilus mussels, sampled in Europe and genotyped with 77 ancestry‐informative markers. We identified a type of introduced mussels, called “dock mussels,” associated with port habitats and displaying a particular genetic signal of admixture between M. edulis and the Mediterranean lineage of M. galloprovincialis. These mussels exhibit similarities in their ancestry compositions, regardless of the local native genetic backgrounds and the distance separating colonised ports. We observed fine‐scale genetic shifts at the port entrance, at scales below natural dispersal distance. Such sharp clines do not fit with migration‐selection tension zone models, and instead suggest habitat choice and early‐stage adaptation to the port environment, possibly coupled with connectivity barriers. Variations in the spread and admixture patterns of dock mussels seem to be influenced by the local native genetic backgrounds encountered. We next examined departures from the average admixture rate at different loci, and compared human‐mediated admixture events, to naturally admixed populations and experimental crosses. When the same M. galloprovincialis background was involved, positive correlations in the departures of loci across locations were found; but when different backgrounds were involved, no or negative correlations were observed. While some observed positive correlations might be best explained by a shared history and saltatory colonisation, others are likely produced by parallel selective events. Altogether, genome‐wide effect of admixture seems repeatable and more dependent on genetic background than environmental context. Our results pave the way towards further genomic analyses of admixture, and monitoring of the spread of dock mussels both at large and at fine spacial scales. 
PY 2020
PD MAR
SO Evolutionary Applications
SN 1752-4571
PU Wiley
VL 13
IS 3
UT 000497990000001
BP 575
EP 599
DI 10.1111/eva.12879
ID 70600
ER

EF