FN Archimer Export Format PT J TI Response of Total and Eddy Kinetic Energy to the recent spin up of the Beaufort Gyre BT AF Regan, Heather Lique, Camille Talandier, Claude Meneghello, Gianluca AS 1:1;2:1;3:3;4:2; FF 1:PDG-ODE-LOPS-OH;2:PDG-ODE-LOPS-OH;3:;4:; C1 Univ. Brest, CNRS, IRD, Ifremer, Laboratoire d’Océanographie Physique et Spatiale (LOPS), IUEM, Brest 29280, France Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139-4307, USA Univ. Brest, CNRS, IRD, Ifremer, Laboratoire d’Océanographie Physique et Spatiale (LOPS), IUEM, Brest 29280, France C2 IFREMER, FRANCE MIT, USA CNRS, FRANCE SI BREST SE PDG-ODE-LOPS-OH UM LOPS IN WOS Ifremer UMR WOS Cotutelle UMR copubli-france copubli-int-hors-europe IF 3.373 TC 25 UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00598/71015/69288.pdf LA English DT Article DE ;Ocean;Arctic;Eddies;Ocean dynamics;Ocean models AB The Beaufort Gyre in the Arctic Ocean has spun up over the past two decades in response to changes of the wind forcing and sea ice conditions, accumulating a significant amount of freshwater. Here a simulation performed with a high-resolution, eddy resolving model is analyzed in order to provide a detailed description of the total and eddy kinetic energy, and their response to this spin up of the gyre. On average, and in contrast to the typical open ocean conditions, the levels of mean and eddy kinetic energy are of the same order of magnitude, and the eddy kinetic energy is only intensified along the boundary and in the subsurface. In response to the strong anomalous atmospheric conditions in 2007, the gyre spins up and the mean kinetic energy almost doubles, while the eddy kinetic energy does not increase significantly for a long time period. This is because the isopycnals are able to flatten and the gyre expands outwards, reducing the potential for baroclinic instability. These results have implications for understanding the mechanisms at play for equilibrating the Beaufort Gyre and the variability and future changes of the Arctic freshwater system. PY 2020 PD MAR SO Journal Of Physical Oceanography SN 0022-3670 PU American Meteorological Society VL 50 IS 3 UT 000518029100001 BP 575 EP 594 DI 10.1175/JPO-D-19-0234.1 ID 71015 ER EF