FN Archimer Export Format PT J TI Fishing restrictions and remoteness deliver conservation outcomes for Indonesia's coral reef fisheries BT AF Campbell, Stuart J. Darling, Emily S. Pardede, Shinta Ahmadia, Gabby Mangubhai, Sangeeta Maire, Eva AS 1:1,2;2:3,4;3:1;4:5;5:3,6;6:7;7:7;8:8,9; FF 1:;2:;3:;4:;5:;6:;7:;8:; C1 Indonesia Program Wildlife Conservation Society Bogor West Java, Indonesia Rare Indonesia Bogor West Java, Indonesia Wildlife Conservation Society Global Marine Program Bronx New York, USA Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Toronto Toronto Ontario ,Canada World Wildlife Fund Washington DC, USA The Nature Conservancy Sorong West Papua, Indonesia WWF Indonesia Conservation Science Unit Jakarta West Java, Indonesia MARBEC Univ. Montpellier, CNRS, Ifremer, IRD Montpellier, France Lancaster Environment Centre Lancaster University Lancaster, UK C2 WILDLIFE CONSERVAT SOC, INDONESIA RARE INDONESIA, INDONESIA WILDLIFE CONSERVAT SOC, USA UNIV TORONTO, CANADA WWF, USA NATURE CONSERVANCY, INDONESIA WWF, INDONESIA UNIV MONTPELLIER, FRANCE UNIV LANCASTER, UK UM MARBEC IN WOS Cotutelle UMR DOAJ copubli-europe copubli-int-hors-europe copubli-sud IF 4.694 TC 35 UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00607/71947/70645.pdf https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00607/71947/70646.pdf LA English DT Article DE ;data-poor fisheries;food webs;gear restrictions;marine protected areas;small-scale fisheries;South East Asia AB Coral reef fisheries depend on reef fish biomass to support ecosystem functioning and sustainable fisheries. Here, we evaluated coral reefs across 4,000 km of the Indonesian archipelago to reveal a large gradient of biomass, from <100 kg/ha to >17,000 kg/ha. Trophic pyramids characterized by planktivore dominance emerged at high biomass, suggesting the importance of pelagic pathways for reef productivity. Total biomass and the biomass of most trophic groups were higher within gear restricted and no‐take management, but the greatest biomass was found on unmanaged remote reefs. Within marine protected areas (MPAs), 41.6% and 43.6% of gear restricted and no‐take zones, respectively, met a global biomass target of 500 kg/ha, compared with 71.8% of remote sites. To improve conservation outcomes for Indonesia's biodiverse and economically important coral reef fisheries, our results suggest to: (1) strengthen management within Indonesia's existing MPAs and (2) precautionarily manage remote reefs with high biomass. PY 2020 PD MAR SO Conservation Letters SN 1755-263X PU Wiley VL 13 IS 2 UT 000510789900001 DI 10.1111/conl.12698 ID 71947 ER EF