Workshop on Challenges, Opportunities, Needs and Successes for Including Human Dimen-sions in Integrated Ecosystem Assessments (WKCONSERVE)

Type Article
Date 2020
Language English
Author(s) ICES
Contributor(s) Belgrano Andrea, Clay Patricia, Colburn Lisa, De Piper Geret, Eilersen Malene, Glyki Eirini, Goldsborough David, Goti Leyre, Guillen Jodi, Haynie Alan, Jarre Astrid, Kasperski Steve, Kellner Julie, Kenny Andrew, Kraan Marloes, Krogh Hallin Julie, Langlet David, Lindegren Martin, Martinez Inigo, Pedreschi Debbi, Ramirez Paulina, Schmidt Jorn, Skern-Mauritzen Mette, Sofia Rodriguez Alondra, Sundbald Eva-Lotta, Thebaud OlivierORCID, Van Leuwen Sonja, Waldo Staffan
Source ICES Scientific Reports/Rapports scientifiques du CIEM (2618-1371) (ICES), 2020 , Vol. 2 , N. 10 , P. 30p.
DOI 10.17895/ices.pub.5950
Abstract

To support the implementation of the Ecosystem Based approach to Management (EBM), ICES strives to provide evidence-based scientific advice and relevant management options that also assess potential trade-offs among sectors or between environmental status and human uses. To help achieve this, the Workshop on Challenges, Opportunities, Needs and Successes in including human dimensions in Integrated Ecosystem Assessments (IEAs) (WKCONSERVE) focused on economic, social, and interdisciplinary research and data needed to inform on the societal drivers and objectives of marine resource use as context for advice. More specifically, the workshop goals were to a) summarize social and economic data, indicators and relevant research done across ICES IEA regions and other IEA regions, b) Identify goals for including social and eco-nomic data and analyses in different IEAs, and c) to develop a roadmap for including social and economic data and analyses in IEAs, identifying common needs across groups and unique pri-orities of each region.

Discussion across IEA groups made clear that while great strides have been made in ICES IEA groups to identify and provide important ecological measures relevant to EBM, far less attention has been given to providing comparable economic and social information. WKCONSERVE iden-tified a number of practical steps to take to include more societal measures relevant to EBM. These differ among regions, depending on data availability and ecosystem context, and are de-tailed in IEA roadmaps developed during the workshop. However, in general, the first step in-volves including social scientists in the IEA groups. Key topics and data for each IEA region were identified. It was, however, repeatedly noted that more interaction with stakeholders will help both IEA and human dimensions Expert Groups to better develop research and data collection efforts to address stakeholder needs. A lack of funding is a key obstacle to the development of IEAs, both regarding science and advisory products.

It is now up to each IEA group to use the developed roadmaps to include the human dimension in IEAs. Furthermore, to support the development of methods for integration, follow-up work-shops should be organized on a regular basis (e.g. every other year).

Full Text
File Pages Size Access
Publisher's official version 36 1014 KB Open access
Top of the page