FN Archimer Export Format PT J TI Channel-levee evolution in combined contour current-turbidity current flows from flume-tank experiments BT AF MIRAMONTES, Elda EGGENHUISEN, Joris T. SILVA JACINTO, Ricardo PONETI, Giovanni POHL, Florian NORMANDEAU, Alexandre CAMPBELL, D. Calvin HERNANDEZ-MOLINA, F. Javier AS 1:1,2;2:3;3:2;4:4;5:3,5;6:6;7:6;8:7; FF 1:;2:;3:PDG-REM-GM-LGS;4:;5:;6:;7:;8:; C1 Univ Bretagne Occidentale, IUEM, CNRS, Lab Geosci Ocean,UMR 6538, F-29280 Plouzane, France. IFREMER, Inst Francais Rech Exploitat Mer, Geosci Marines, F-29280 Plouzane, France. Univ Utrecht, Fac Geosci, NL-3584 CB Utrecht, Netherlands. Univ Florence, Dept Earth Sci, I-50121 Florence, Italy. Univ Durham, Dept Earth Sci, Durham 1DH 3LE, England. Nat Resources Canada, Geol Survey Canada Atlantic, Dartmouth, NS B2Y 4A2, Canada. Royal Holloway Univ London, Dept Earth Sci, Egham TW20 0EX, Surrey, England. C2 CNRS, FRANCE IFREMER, FRANCE UNIV UTRECHT, NETHERLANDS UNIV FLORENCE, ITALY UNIV DURHAM, UK GEOL SURVEY CANADA ATLANTIC, CANADA UNIV ROYAL HOLLOWAY LONDON, UK SI BREST SE PDG-REM-GM-LGS UM LGO IN WOS Ifremer UPR copubli-france copubli-europe copubli-int-hors-europe IF 5.399 TC 60 UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00624/73602/73028.pdf LA English DT Article AB Turbidity currents and contour currents are common sedimentary and oceanographic processes in deep-marine settings that affect continental margins worldwide. Their simultaneous interaction can form asymmetric and unidirectionally migrating channels, which can lead to opposite interpretations of paleocontour current direction: channels migrating against the contour current or in the direction of the contour current. In this study, we performed three-dimensional flume-tank experiments of the synchronous interaction between contour currents and turbidity currents to understand the effect of these combined currents on channel architecture and evolution. Our results show that contour currents with a velocity of 10-19 cm s(-1) can substantially deflect the direction of turbidity currents with a maximum velocity of 76-96 cm s(-1), and modify the channel-levee system architecture. A lateral and nearly stationary front formed on the levee located upstream of the contour current, reduced overspill and thus restrained the development of a levee on this side of the channel. Sediment was preferentially carried out of the channel at the flank located downstream of the contour current. An increase in contour-current velocity resulted in an increase in channel-levee asymmetry, with the development of a wider levee and more abundant bedforms downstream of the contour current. This asymmetric deposition along the channel suggests that the direction of long-term migration of the channel form should go against the direction of the contour current due to levee growth downstream of the contour current, in agreement with one of the previously proposed conceptual models. PY 2020 PD APR SO Geology SN 0091-7613 PU Geological Soc Amer, Inc VL 48 IS 4 UT 000524233700012 BP 353 EP 357 DI 10.1130/G47111.1 ID 73602 ER EF