FN Archimer Export Format
PT J
TI Heterospecific foraging associations between reef‐associated sharks: first evidence of kleptoparasitism in sharks
BT 
AF Labourgade, Pierre
   Ballesta, Laurent
   Huveneers, Charlie
   Papastamatiou, Yannis
   Mourier, Johann
AS 1:1;2:2;3:3;4:4;5:1,5;
FF 1:;2:;3:;4:;5:;
C1 MARBEC Univ Montpellier CNRS IFREMER IRD Sète ,France
   Andromède Océanologie Carnon, France
   Southern Shark Ecology Group College of Science and Engineering Flinders University Adelaide South Australia, Australia
   Department of Biological Sciences Florida International University North Miami, USA
   PSL Université Paris: EPHE‐UPVD‐CNRS USR 3278 CRIOBE Papetoai Moorea, French Polynesia
C2 IRD, FRANCE
   ANDROMEDE OCEANOLOGIE, FRANCE
   UNIV ADELAIDE, AUSTRALIA
   UNIV FLORIDA INT, USA
   CNRS, FRANCE
UM MARBEC
IN WOS Cotutelle UMR
   copubli-france
   copubli-int-hors-europe
IF 5.499
TC 6
UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00632/74456/74272.pdf
   https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00632/74456/74273.mp4
   https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00632/74456/74274.pdf
   https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00632/74456/74368.pdf
   https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00632/74456/80842.pdf
LA English
DT Article
DE ;Carcharhinus amblyrhynchos;foraging strategy;French Polynesia;reef shark;species interaction;Triaenodon obesus
AB Social foraging allows groups of predators to search for, pursue, and capture prey with greater efficiency than using solitary hunting. It can vary in complexity and take many forms ranging from cooperative hunting, to social information sharing and local enhancement (Lang and Farine 2017). Theoretical and empirical studies support the advantages of group foraging, although there will be trade‐offs between benefits, such as increased prey detection or capture success, and costs such as increased competition amongst group members (Gil et al. 2017). 
PY 2020
PD NOV
SO Ecology
SN 0012-9658
PU Wiley
VL 101
IS 11
UT 000548416400001
DI 10.1002/ecy.3117
ID 74456
ER

EF