FN Archimer Export Format
PT J
TI Marine and coastal ecosystem services on the science–policy–practice nexus: challenges and opportunities from 11 European case studies
BT 
AF Drakou, Evangelia G.
   Kermagoret, Charlene
   Liquete, Camino
   Ruiz-Frau, Ana
   Burkhard, Kremena
   Lillebø, Ana I.
   van Oudenhoven, Alexander P. E.
   Ballé-Béganton, Johanna
   Rodrigues, João Garcia
   Nieminen, Emmi
   Oinonen, Soile
   Ziemba, Alex
   Gissi, Elena
   Depellegrin, Daniel
   Veidemane, Kristina
   Ruskule, Anda
   Delangue, Justine
   Böhnke-Henrichs, Anne
   Boon, Arjen
   Wenning, Richard
   Martino, Simone
   Hasler, Berit
   Termansen, Mette
   Rockel, Mark
   Hummel, Herman
   El Serafy, Ghada
   Peev, Plamen
AS 1:1,2;2:1;3:3;4:4;5:5;6:6;7:7;8:1;9:8,9;10:10;11:10;12:11;13:12;14:13;15:14;16:14;17:15;18:16;19:11;20:17;21:18;22:19;23:19;24:17;25:20;26:11;27:21;
FF 1:;2:PDG-RBE-EM;3:;4:;5:;6:;7:;8:;9:;10:;11:;12:;13:;14:;15:;16:;17:;18:;19:;20:;21:;22:;23:;24:;25:;26:;27:;
C1 UMR M101, AMURE, CNRS, OSU-IUEM, Université de Brest, Brest, France
   Department of Geo-Information Processing, Faculty of Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), University of Twente, Enschede, Netherlands
   European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy
   Department of Global Change Research, Instituto Mediterráneo de Estudios Avanzados, IMEDEA (CSIC-UIB), Esporles, Spain
   Institute of Environmental Planning, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany
   Department of Biology & Centre for Environmental and Marine Studies (CESAM), University of Aveiro, Aveiro, Portugal
   Institute of Environmental Sciences CML, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands
   Faculty of Political and Social Sciences, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
   Campus Do*Mar – International Campus of Excellence, Vigo, Spain
   Finnish Environment Institute (SYKE), Marine Research Centre, Helsinki, Finland
   Marine and Coastal Systems Department, Deltares, Delft, The Netherlands
   Department of Design and Planning in Complex Environment, University Iuav of Venice, Venice, Italy
   Institute of Marine Science, National Research Council, Venice, Italy
   Baltic Environmental Forum, Riga, Latvia
   French Committee of IUCN, Paris, France
   Environmental Systems Analysis Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
   Ramboll Environ, Portland, ME, USA
   Laurence Mee Centre for Society & Sea, Scottish Association for Marine Science, Oban, UK
   Department of Environmental Science, Aarhus University, Roskilde, Denmark
   Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Yerseke, The Netherlands
   BlueLink Foundation, Sofia, Bulgaria
C2 UBO, FRANCE
   UNIV TWENTE, NETHERLANDS
   JRC, ITALY
   IMEDEA, SPAIN
   UNIV LEIBNIZ HANNOVER, GERMANY
   UNIV AVEIRO, PORTUGAL
   UNIV LEIDEN, NETHERLANDS
   UNIV SANTIAGO DE COMPOSTELA, SPAIN
   UNIV VIGO, SPAIN
   SYKE, FINLAND
   DELTARES, NETHERLANDS
   UNIV VENICE, ITALY
   CNR, ITALY
   BALTIC ENVIRONMENTAL FORUM, LATVIA
   IUCN, FRANCE
   UNIV WAGENINGEN, NETHERLANDS
   RAMBOLL ENVIRON, USA
   SAMS SCOTLAND, UK
   UNIV AARHUS, DENMARK
   INST SEA RESEARCH (NIOZ), NETHERLANDS
   BLUELINK FND, BULGARIA
SI BREST
SE PDG-RBE-EM
UM AMURE
TC 0
UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00637/74867/75267.pdf
LA English
DT Article
DE ;Policy relevance;pan-European approach;uncertainty;ocean literacy;data gaps;bottom-up approach
AB We compared and contrasted 11 European case studies to identify challenges and opportunities toward the operationalization of marine and coastal ecosystem service (MCES) assessments in Europe. This work is the output of a panel convened by the Marine Working Group of the Ecosystem Services Partnership in September 2016. The MCES assessments were used to (1) address multiple policy objectives simultaneously, (2) interpret EU-wide policies to smaller scales and (3) inform local decision-making. Most of the studies did inform decision makers, but only in a few cases, the outputs were applied or informed decision-making. Significant limitations among the 11 assessments were the absence of shared understanding of the ES concept, data and knowledge gaps, difficulties in accounting for marine social–ecological systems complexity and partial stakeholder involvement. The findings of the expert panel call for continuous involvement of MCES ‘end users’, integrated knowledge on marine social–ecological systems, defining thresholds to MCES use and raising awareness to the general public. Such improvements at the intersection of science, policy and practice are essential starting points toward building a stronger science foundation supporting management of European marine ecosystems. 
PY 2018
PD JAN
SO International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management
SN 2151-3732
PU Informa UK Limited
VL 13
IS 3
BP 51
EP 67
DI 10.1080/21513732.2017.1417330
ID 74867
ER

EF