FN Archimer Export Format
PT J
TI Geographic patterns and environmental correlates of taxonomic and phylogenetic beta diversity for large‐scale angiosperm assemblages in China
BT 
AF Qian, Hong
   Jin, Yi
   Leprieur, Fabien
   Wang, Xianli
   Deng, Tao
AS 1:1,2;2:3;3:4;4:5;5:1;
FF 1:;2:;3:;4:;5:;
C1 CAS Key Laboratory for Plant Diversity and Biogeography of East Asia, Kunming Inst. of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences Kunming China
   Research and Collections Center, Illinois State Museum Springfield IL USA
   Key Laboratory of State Forestry Administration on Biodiversity Conservation in Karst Mountainous Areas of Southwestern China, Guizhou Normal Univ. Guiyang China
   MARBEC, Univ. de Montpellier, CNRS, Ifremer, IRD Montpellier, France
   Natural Resources Canada, Canadian Forest Service, Great Lake Forestry Centre Sault Ste. Marie ON Canada
C2 CHINESE ACAD SCI, CHINA
   ILLINOIS STATE MUSEUM, USA
   KEY LABORATORY OF STATE FORESTRY ADMINISTRATION ON BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION IN KARST MOUNTAINOUS AREAS OF SOUTHWESTERN CHINA, CHINA
   UNIV MONTPELLIER, FRANCE
   NATURAL RESOURCES CANADA, CANADA
UM MARBEC
IN WOS Cotutelle UMR
   DOAJ
   copubli-int-hors-europe
   copubli-sud
IF 5.992
TC 44
UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00641/75343/76076.pdf
   https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00641/75343/76077.pdf
LA English
DT Article
DE ;environmental gradient;flowering plant;latitudinal gradient;species turnover
AB A full understanding of the origin and maintenance of β‐diversity patterns in a region requires exploring the relationships of both taxonomic and phylogenetic β‐diversity (TBD and PBD, respectively), and their respective turnover and nestedness components, with geographic and environmental distances. Here, we simultaneously investigated all these aspects of β‐diversity for angiosperms in China. Specifically, we evaluated the relative importance of environmental filtering vs dispersal limitation processes in shaping β‐diversity patterns. We found that TBD and PBD as quantified using a moving window approach decreased towards higher latitudes across the whole of China, and their turnover components were correlated with latitude more strongly than their nestedness components. When quantifying β‐diversity as pairwise distances, geographic and climatic distances across China together explained 60 and 53% of the variation in TBD and PBD, respectively. After the variation in β‐diversity explained by climatic distance was accounted for, geographic distance independently explained about 23 and 12% of the variation in TBD and PBD, respectively, across China. Overall, our results suggest that environmental filtering based on climatic tolerance conserved across lineages is the main force shaping β‐diversity patterns for angiosperms in China. 
PY 2020
PD NOV
SO Ecography
SN 0906-7590
PU Wiley
VL 43
IS 11
UT 000552511100001
BP 1706
EP 1716
DI 10.1111/ecog.05190
ID 75343
ER

EF