FN Archimer Export Format
PT J
TI Addressing Marine and Coastal Governance Conflicts at the Interface of Multiple Sectors and Jurisdictions
BT 
AF Bellanger, Manuel
   Speir, Cameron
   Blanchard, Fabian
   Brooks, Kate
   Butler, James R. A.
   Crosson, Scott
   Fonner, Robert
   Gourguet, Sophie
   Holland, Daniel S.
   Kuikka, Sakari
   Le Gallic, Bertrand
   Lent, Rebecca
   Libecap, Gary D.
   Lipton, Douglas W.
   Nayak, Prateep Kumar
   Reid, David
   Scemama, Pierre
   Stephenson, Robert
   Thébaud, Olivier
   Young, Juliette C.
AS 1:1;2:2;3:3;4:4;5:5;6:6;7:7;8:1;9:7;10:8;11:9;12:10;13:11;14:12;15:13;16:14;17:1;18:15;19:1;20:16,17;
FF 1:PDG-RBE-EM;2:;3:PDG-RBE-BIODIVHAL;4:;5:;6:;7:;8:PDG-RBE-EM;9:;10:;11:;12:;13:;14:;15:;16:;17:PDG-RBE-EM;18:;19:PDG-RBE-EM;20:;
C1 Ifremer, Univ Brest, CNRS, UMR 6308 AMURE, Unité d’Economie Maritime, IUEM, Plouzané, France
   Southwest Fisheries Science Center, NOAA Fisheries, Santa Cruz, CA, United States
   Ifremer, USR 3456 LEEISA (CNRS, Université de Guyane, Ifremer), Cayenne, France
   School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
   CSIRO Land and Water, Brisbane, QLD, Australia
   Southeast Fisheries Science Center, NOAA Fisheries, Miami, FL, United States
   Northwest Fisheries Science Center, NOAA Fisheries, Seattle, WA, United States
   Ecosystems and Environment Research Program, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
   Univ Brest, Ifremer, CNRS, UMR 6308 AMURE, Brest, France
   International Whaling Commission, Cambridge, United Kingdom
   Bren School of Environmental Science, UC Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA, United States
   NOAA Fisheries, Silver Spring, MD, United States
   School of Environment, Enterprise and Development, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada
   Marine Institute, Galway, Ireland
   Fisheries and Oceans Canada, St. Andrews Biological Station, St. Andrews, NB, Canada
   UK Center of Ecology & Hydrology, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
   Agroécologie, AgroSup Dijon, Institut National de Recherche pour l’Agriculture, l’Alimentation et l’Environnement (INRAE), University Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France
C2 IFREMER, FRANCE
   NOAA, USA
   IFREMER, FRANCE
   UNIV DEAKIN, AUSTRALIA
   CSIRO LAND AND WATER, AUSTRALIA
   NOAA, USA
   NOAA, USA
   UNIV HELSINKI, FINLAND
   UBO, FRANCE
   INTERNTL WHALING COMM, UK
   UNIV CALIF SANTA BARBARA, USA
   NOAA, USA
   UNIV WATERLOO, CANADA
   MARINE INST, IRELAND
   MPO, CANADA
   UK CENTER OF ECOLOGY & HYDROLOGY, UK
   INRAE, FRANCE
SI BREST
   GUYANE
SE PDG-RBE-EM
   PDG-RBE-BIODIVHAL
UM AMURE
   LEEISA
IN WOS Ifremer UMR
   WOS Cotutelle UMR
   DOAJ
   copubli-france
   copubli-p187
   copubli-europe
   copubli-univ-france
   copubli-int-hors-europe
IF 5.247
TC 17
UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00652/76376/77383.pdf
   https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00652/76376/77384.docx
LA English
DT Article
DE ;trade-offs;ecosystem management;ecosystem services;cross-sectoral coordination;marine governance;multi-jurisdictional conflicts;institutions;environmental policy
AB Marine and coastal activities are closely interrelated, and conflicts among different sectors can undermine management and conservation objectives. Governance systems for fisheries, power generation, irrigation, aquaculture, marine biodiversity conservation, and other coastal and maritime activities are typically organized to manage conflicts within sectors, rather than across them. Based on the discussions around eight case studies presented at a workshop held in Brest in June 2019, this paper explores institutional approaches to move beyond managing conflicts within a sector. We primarily focus on cases where the groups and sectors involved are heterogeneous in terms of: the jurisdiction they fall under; their objectives; and the way they value ecosystem services. The paper first presents a synthesis of frameworks for understanding and managing cross-sectoral governance conflicts, drawing from social and natural sciences. We highlight commonalities but also conceptual differences across disciplines to address these issues. We then propose a novel analytical framework which we used to evaluate the eight case studies. Based on the main lessons learned from case studies, we then discuss the feasibility and key determinants of stakeholder collaboration as well as compensation and incentive schemes. The discussion concludes with future research needs to support policy development and inform integrated institutional regimes that consider the diversity of stakeholder interests and the potential benefits of cross-sectoral coordination 
PY 2020
PD SEP
SO Frontiers In Marine Science
SN 2296-7745
PU Frontiers Media SA
VL 7
IS 544440
UT 000571909200001
DI 10.3389/fmars.2020.544440
ID 76376
ER

EF