FN Archimer Export Format PT J TI Evolutionary dynamics in the Anthropocene: Life history and intensity of human contact shape antipredator responses BT AF Geffroy, Benjamin Sadoul, Bastien Putman, Breanna J. Berger-Tal, Oded Garamszegi, László Zsolt Møller, Anders Pape Blumstein, Daniel T. de Waal, Frans B. M. AS 1:1;2:1;3:2;4:3;5:4;6:5,6;7:2;8:; FF 1:PDG-RBE-MARBEC-LAAAS;2:PDG-RBE-MARBEC-LAAAS;3:;4:;5:;6:;7:;8:; C1 MARBEC, Univ Montpellier, Ifremer, IRD, CNRS, Palavas-Les-Flots, France Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States of America, Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Department of Herpetology and Urban Nature Research Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America Mitrani Department of Desert Ecology, Jacob Blaustein Institutes for Desert Research, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Israel Centre for Ecological Research, Institute of Ecology and Botany, Vácrátót, Hungary, MTA-ELTE, Theoretical Biology and Evolutionary Ecology Research Group, Department of Plant Systematics, Ecology and Theoretical Biology, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary Laboratoire d’Ecologie, Systematique et Evolution, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Universite Paris-Sud, France Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Biodiversity Science and Ecological Engineering, College of Life Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China C2 IFREMER, FRANCE UNIV CALIF LOS ANGELES, USA UNIV NEGEV, ISRAEL UNIV BUDAPEST, HUNGARY CNRS, FRANCE UNIV BEIJING, CHINA SI PALAVAS SE PDG-RBE-MARBEC-LAAAS UM MARBEC IN WOS Ifremer UMR DOAJ copubli-france copubli-europe copubli-int-hors-europe copubli-sud IF 8.029 TC 35 UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00652/76397/77422.pdf https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00652/76397/77423.tif https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00652/76397/77424.tif https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00652/76397/77425.tif https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00652/76397/77426.tif https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00652/76397/77427.tiff https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00652/76397/77428.xlsx https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00652/76397/77429.xlsx https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00652/76397/77430.xlsx https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00652/76397/77431.csv https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00652/76397/77432.xlsx https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00652/76397/77433.xlsx https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00652/76397/77434.zip LA English DT Article AB Humans profoundly impact landscapes, ecosystems, and animal behavior. In many cases, animals living near humans become tolerant of them and reduce antipredator responses. Yet, we still lack an understanding of the underlying evolutionary dynamics behind these shifts in traits that affect animal survival. Here, we used a phylogenetic meta-analysis to determine how the mean and variability in antipredator responses change as a function of the number of generations spent in contact with humans under 3 different contexts: urbanization, captivity, and domestication. We found that any contact with humans leads to a rapid reduction in mean antipredator responses as expected. Notably, the variance among individuals over time observed a short-term increase followed by a gradual decrease, significant for domesticated animals. This implies that intense human contact immediately releases animals from predation pressure and then imposes strong anthropogenic selection on traits. In addition, our results reveal that the loss of antipredator traits due to urbanization is similar to that of domestication but occurs 3 times more slowly. Furthermore, the rapid disappearance of antipredator traits was associated with 2 main life-history traits: foraging guild and whether the species was solitary or gregarious (i.e., group-living). For domesticated animals, this decrease in antipredator behavior was stronger for herbivores than for omnivores or carnivores and for solitary than for gregarious species. By contrast, the decrease in antipredator traits was stronger for gregarious, urbanized species, although this result is based mostly on birds. Our study offers 2 major insights on evolution in the Anthropocene: (1) changes in traits occur rapidly even under unintentional human “interventions” (i.e., urbanization) and (2) there are similarities between the selection pressures exerted by domestication and by urbanization. In all, such changes could affect animal survival in a predator-rich world, but through understanding evolutionary dynamics, we can better predict when and how exposure to humans modify these fitness-related traits. PY 2020 PD SEP SO Plos Biology SN 1544-9173 PU Public Library of Science (PLoS) VL 18 IS 9 UT 000575067300001 DI 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000818 ID 76397 ER EF