FN Archimer Export Format
PT J
TI Intraspecific variation in tolerance of warming in fishes
BT 
AF McKenzie, David
   Zhang, Yurui
   Eliason, E.J.
   Schulte, P.M.
   Claireaux, Guy
   Blasco, F.R.
   Nati, Julie
   Farrell, A.P.
AS 1:1;2:2;3:3;4:2;5:4;6:5,6;7:1;8:2,7;
FF 1:;2:;3:;4:;5:;6:;7:;8:;
C1 MARBEC, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, IFREMER, IRD Montpellier ,France
   Department of Zoology University of British Columbia Vancouver BC, Canada
   UC Santa Barbara ,USA
   Université de Bretagne Occidentale, LEMAR (UMR 6539), Centre Ifremer de Bretagne Plouzané ,France
   Department of Physiological Sciences Federal University of São Carlos São Carlos SP, Brazil
   Joint Graduate Program in Physiological Sciences Federal University of São Carlos – UFSCar/São Paulo State University, UNESP Campus Araraquara Araraquara SP ,Brazil
   Faculty of Land and Food Systems University of British Columbia Vancouver BC, Canada
C2 CNRS, FRANCE
   UNIV BRITISH COLUMBIA, CANADA
   UNIV CALIF SANTA BARBARA, USA
   UBO, FRANCE
   UNIV FED SAO CARLOS UFSCAR, BRAZIL
   UNIV FED SAO CARLOS UFSCAR, BRAZIL
   UNIV BRITISH COLUMBIA, CANADA
UM LEMAR
   MARBEC
IN WOS Cotutelle UMR
   copubli-france
   copubli-univ-france
   copubli-int-hors-europe
   copubli-sud
IF 2.504
TC 69
UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00660/77178/78593.pdf
LA English
DT Article
DE ;adaptation;critical thermal maximum;phenotypic plasticity;size effects;thermal performance curve;vulnerability
AB Intraspecific variation in key traits such as tolerance of warming can have profound effects on ecological and evolutionary processes, notably responses to climate change. We review the empirical evidence for three primary elements of intraspecific variation in tolerance of warming in fishes. The first is purely mechanistic, that tolerance varies across life stages and as fishes grow to maturity. The limited evidence indicates strongly that this is the case, possibly due to universal physiological principles. The second is intraspecific variation that is due to phenotypic plasticity, also a mechanistic phenomenon that buffers individuals’ sensitivity to negative impacts of global warming in their lifetime, or to some extent through epigenetic effects over successive generations. Although the evidence for plasticity in tolerance to warming is extensive, more work is required to understand underlying mechanisms and to reveal whether there are general patterns. The third element is intraspecific variation based upon heritable genetic differences in tolerance, which underlies local adaptation and may define long term adaptability of a species in the face of ongoing global change. There is clear evidence of local adaptation and some evidence of heritability of tolerance to warming, but the knowledge base is limited with detailed information for only a few model or emblematic species. There is also strong evidence of structured variation in tolerance of warming within species, which may have ecological and evolutionary significance irrespective of whether it reflects plasticity or adaptation. Although the overwhelming consensus is that having broader intraspecific variation in tolerance should reduce species vulnerability to impacts of global warming, there is not sufficient data on fishes to provide insight into particular mechanisms by which this may occur. 
PY 2021
PD JUL
SO Journal Of Fish Biology
SN 0022-1112
PU Wiley
VL 98
IS 6
UT 000600039500001
BP 1536
EP 1555
DI 10.1111/jfb.14620
ID 77178
ER

EF