FN Archimer Export Format PT J TI Scale-dependency in discrete choice models: A fishery application BT AF Dépalle, Maxime Sanchirico, James N. Thébaud, Olivier O’Farrell, Shay Haynie, Alan C. Perruso, Larry AS 1:1;2:1,2,3;3:4;4:2,3;5:5;6:6; FF 1:;2:;3:PDG-RBE-EM;4:;5:;6:; C1 Department of Agricultural & Resources Economics, University of California, Davis, USA Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California, Davis, USA Coastal and Marine Sciences Institute, University of California, Davis, USA Ifremer, UMR 6308, AMURE, Unité d’Economie Maritime, France NOAA Alaska Fisheries Science Center, USA NOAA Southeast Fisheries Science Center, USA C2 UNIV CALIF DAVIS, USA UNIV CALIF DAVIS, USA UNIV CALIF DAVIS, USA IFREMER, FRANCE NOAA, USA NOAA, USA SI BREST SE PDG-RBE-EM UM AMURE IN WOS Ifremer UMR copubli-int-hors-europe IF 5.84 TC 4 UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00661/77272/79206.pdf LA English DT Article DE ;Spatial modeling;Discrete-choice model;VMS data;Fisher behavior;Monte Carlo experiments AB Modeling the spatial behavior of fishers is critical in assessing fishery management policies and has been dominated by discrete choice models (DCM). Motivated by the widespread availability of micro-data on fishing vessel locations, this paper examines the complexity associated with the choice of the spatial scale in a DCM of fishing locations. Our empirical approach estimates the standard DCM at varying spatial resolutions using both simulated data and vessel monitoring system data from the Gulf of Mexico longline fishery. We assess model performance using goodness-of-fit, predictive capacity, parameter estimates, and the assessment of the fishery response to a hypothetical marine protected area. Results show that, even when the specification of the decision-making process is correct, models can be structurally biased because of the aggregation of spatial scale that neglects the value of many fishing locations. The extent of such biases can only be detected by considering various spatial aggregation levels. PY 2021 PD JAN SO Journal Of Environmental Economics And Management SN 0095-0696 PU Elsevier BV VL 105 UT 000607089900004 DI 10.1016/j.jeem.2020.102388 ID 77272 ER EF