FN Archimer Export Format
PT J
TI The impact of academic information supply and familiarity on preferences for ecosystem services
BT 
AF Sy, Mariam Maki
   Rey-Valette, Hélène
   Figuières, Charles
   Simier, Monique
   De Wit, Rutger
AS 1:1;2:2;3:3;4:4;5:1;
FF 1:;2:;3:;4:;5:;
C1 MARBEC, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, Ifremer, IRD, Place Eugène Bataillon, 34095 Montpellier Cedex 5, France
   Centre d'Economie de I'Environnement – Montpellier (CEE – M), Université de Montpellier, CNRS, INRAE, Institut Agro, Avenue Raymond Dugrand, 34000 Montpellier, France
   Aix-Marseille Université, UMR AMSE (CNRS, EHESS, Ecole centrale de Marseille, Université d'Aix-Marseille), 5 boulevard Maurice Bourdet, CS 50498, 13205 Marseille Cedex 01, France
   MARBEC, Université de Montpellier, CNRS, Ifremer, IRD, Avenue Jean Monnet, 34203 Sète, France
C2 UNIV MONTPELLIER, FRANCE
   UNIV MONTPELLIER, FRANCE
   UNIV AIX MARSEILLE, FRANCE
   IRD, FRANCE
UM MARBEC
IN WOS Cotutelle UMR
   copubli-france
   copubli-univ-france
IF 6.536
TC 10
UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00677/78881/81268.pdf
LA English
DT Article
DE ;Preference elicitation;Coastal lagoons;Citizens' workshop;Paternalism;Cultural ecosystem services (CES);Veil of ignorance
AB Preferences elicitation can be a challenging exercise for citizens participating in assessment surveys. It is even more challenging when it comes to complex and unfamiliar ecosystems and the threatened ecosystem services they provide. Making people aware of the characteristics of the ecosystem services being valued is determinant for the assessment process. We investigated the impact of familiarity and academic information supply on people's preferences for twenty selected ecosystem services of French Mediterranean coastal lagoons. The results show that regardless of familiarity and information supply, there is a strong consensus about the highest importance of regulation and maintenance ecosystem services as well as environmental education and research opportunity ecosystem services. By contrast, nine of the cultural ecosystem services, together with two provisioning ecosystem services showed heterogeneous preferences among the different citizen groups. Using a combination of descriptive and inferential statistics these eleven ecosystem services split up into three clusters characterized as (i) contemplative leisure, (ii) heritage, and (iii) consumptive activities. Familiarity and academic information supply had a strong impact on the preferences for these three clusters of ecosystem services. 
PY 2021
PD MAY
SO Ecological Economics
SN 0921-8009
PU Elsevier BV
VL 183
UT 000629260900005
DI 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2021.106959
ID 78881
ER

EF