FN Archimer Export Format
PT J
TI Technical note: Interpreting pH changes
BT 
AF Fassbender, Andrea J.
   Orr, James C.
   Dickson, Andrew G.
AS 1:1;2:2;3:3;
FF 1:;2:;3:;
C1 Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute, 7700 Sandholdt Road, Moss Landing, CA 95039, USA
   LSCE/IPSL, Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement, CEA-CNRS-UVSQ, Gif-sur-Yvette, France
   Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA
C2 MONTEREY BAY AQUARIUM RES INST, USA
   LSCE, FRANCE
   UNIV CALIF SAN DIEGO, USA
IN DOAJ
IF 5.092
TC 30
UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00683/79539/82217.pdf
   https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00683/79539/82219.pdf
   https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00683/79539/82220.pdf
   https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00683/79539/82221.pdf
LA English
DT Article
CR OISO - OCÉAN INDIEN SERVICE D'OBSERVATION
AB he number and quality of ocean pH measurements have increased substantially over the past few decades such that trends, variability, and spatial patterns of change are now being evaluated. However, comparing pH changes across domains with different initial pH values can be misleading because a pH change reflects a relative change in the hydrogen ion concentration ([H+], expressed in mol kg−1) rather than an absolute change in [H+]. We recommend that [H+] be used in addition to pH when describing such changes and provide three examples illustrating why. 
PY 2021
PD FEB
SO Biogeosciences
SN 1726-4170
PU Copernicus GmbH
VL 18
IS 4
UT 000624347100001
BP 1407
EP 1415
DI 10.5194/bg-18-1407-2021
ID 79539
ER

EF