FN Archimer Export Format PT J TI Spatio-temporal drivers of microphytoplankton community in the Bay of Biscay: do species ecological niches matter? BT AF HOULIEZ, Emilie Lefebvre, Sebastien Dessier, Aurélie Huret, Martin Marquis, Elise Bréret, Martine Dupuy, Christine AS 1:1;2:2;3:1;4:3;5:1;6:1;7:1; FF 1:;2:;3:;4:PDG-RBE-STH-LBH;5:;6:;7:; C1 Littoral Environnement et Sociétés (LIENSs), UMR 7266, CNRS-Université de La Rochelle, 2 rue Olympe de Gouges, 17042 La Rochelle Cedex 01, France Université de Lille, CNRS, Université du Littoral Côte d'Opale, UMR 8187, LOG, Laboratoire d'Océanologie et de Géosciences, F 62930 Wimereux, France IFREMER, Laboratoire de Biologie Halieutique, Centre Bretagne - Zl de la Pointe du Diable - CS 10070 - 29280 Plouzané C2 UNIV LA ROCHELLE, FRANCE UNIV LILLE, FRANCE IFREMER, FRANCE SI BREST SE PDG-RBE-STH-LBH IN WOS Ifremer UPR copubli-france copubli-univ-france IF 4.416 TC 9 UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00685/79663/82428.pdf LA English DT Article CR PELGAS DE ;Ecological niche;Phytoplankton;Outlying mean index;WitOMI;Spatial processes;Zooplankton AB From 2000 to 2016, substantial changes in biomass and community structure of small pelagic fish and mesozooplankton have been reported in the Bay of Biscay. Since significant relationships have been found between phytoplankton chlorophyll a and mesozooplankton as well as between phytoplankton chlorophyll a and shifts in sardine body condition, it was hypothesized that phytoplankton communities may have also been affected during this period and may have played a role in these changes. However, the available data were insufficient to validate this hypothesis and the causes of these changes remained unexplained. The present study analyzed a spatio-temporal marine microphytoplankton dataset collected during the annual PELGAS (PELagiques GAScogne) surveys from 2003 to 2014. The thorough analysis of microphytoplankton taxonomic composition, with an approach integrating the relative role of environmental conditions as well as biotic interactions and applying the concept of ecological niche, confirmed that significant modifications in microphytoplankton community structure occurred during this period. Temporal changes were stronger than spatial differences at these sampling scales. Three main periods, 2003-2005, 2006 and 2007-2014, showing different community structure, diversity and dominant taxonomic units were highlighted. Twenty eight taxonomic units were involved in these community changes. Among them, five were identified as the protagonists (Pseudo-nitzschia spp., Gymnodinium spp. + Gyrodinium spp., Leptocylindrus danicus, Leptocylindrus minimus and Chaetoceros sp.). Variations in water temperature and equivalent freshwater depth constrained the realized ecological niches of these species and explained, at least in part, changes in community structure. This study stresses the need to improve our knowledge of phytoplankton species ecological niches and to take into account biotic interactions for a thorough understanding of the processes shaping plankton communities and the resulting diversity patterns. PY 2021 PD JUL SO Progress In Oceanography SN 0079-6611 PU Elsevier BV VL 194 UT 000653104400002 DI 10.1016/j.pocean.2021.102558 ID 79663 ER EF