FN Archimer Export Format
PT J
TI Diversity and taxonomic revision of tribes Rhipileae and Rhipiliopsideae (Halimedaceae, Chlorophyta) based on molecular and morphological data
BT 
AF Lagourgue, Laura
   Payri, Claude E.
AS 1:1,2;2:2;
FF 1:;2:;
C1 Sorbonne Universités UPMC Univ Paris 06 IFD 4 Place Jussieu Paris ,France
   UMR ENTROPIE (IRD, UR UNC CNRS) Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Nouvelle‐Calédonie Ifremer B.P. A5 Nouméa Cedex 98848, France
C2 UNIV SORBONNE, FRANCE
   IRD, FRANCE
UM ENTROPIE
IN WOS Cotutelle UMR
   copubli-france
   copubli-univ-france
IF 3.173
TC 4
UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00694/80637/83946.pdf
LA English
DT Article
CR BSM-FIDJI
   BSM-LOYAUTE
   CHEST
   CORALCAL-2
   CORALCAL-4
   KAVIENG
   MAD
   MADANG 2012
   PACOTILLES-1
   PACOTILLES-2
BO Alis
   Antea
DE ;Chlorophyta;Kraftalia gen;nov;macroalgae;phylogeny;Rhipiliaceae;Rhipiliospina gen;nov;siphonous;species delimitation
AB Genera and species of the tribes Rhipileae and Rhipiliopsideae are abundant in most coral reef ecosystems worldwide. However, the group has been largely overlooked, and very little genetic data is available to accurately assess its diversity, phylogenetic relationships, and geographical distribution. Our study provided an in-depth reassessment of tribes Rhipileae and Rhipiliopsideae based on a species-rich dataset and the combination of molecular species delimitation, multilocus phylogenetic analyses (tufA, rbcL and 18S rDNA), and morpho-anatomical observations. Our results revealed an unexpected diversity of 38 morphologically-validated species hypotheses, including 20 new species, two of which are described in this paper and one resurrected species (Rhipilia diaphana). Based on our phylogenetic results we proposed to redefine the genera Rhipilia and Rhipiliopsis and described two new genera, Kraftalia gen. nov. (Rhipileae) and Rhipiliospina gen. nov. (Rhipiliopsideae). Finally, we validated Rhipiliella Kraft and included it in tribe Rhipileae. Although Rhipilia and Rhipiliopsis have a pantropical distribution, none of the species studied here appeared cosmopolitan; instead, they have restricted distributions. 
PY 2021
PD OCT
SO Journal Of Phycology
SN 0022-3646
PU Wiley
VL 57
IS 5
UT 000667098800001
BP 1450
EP 1471
DI 10.1111/jpy.13186
ID 80637
ER

EF