FN Archimer Export Format
PT J
TI Physiological biomarkers and fisheries management
BT 
AF Brosset, Pablo
   Cooke, Steven J.
   Schull, Quentin
   Trenkel, Verena
   Soudant, Philippe
   Lebigre, Christophe
AS 1:1,2;2:3;3:4;4:5;5:2;6:1;
FF 1:;2:;3:PDG-RBE-MARBEC-LHM;4:PDG-RBE-EMH;5:;6:PDG-RBE-STH-LBH;
C1 Ifremer, Laboratoire de Biologie Halieutique, ZI Pointe du Diable - CS 10070, 29 280, Plouzané, France
   Université de Brest - UMR 6539 CNRS/UBO/IRD/Ifremer, Laboratoire des sciences de l’environnement marin - IUEM - Rue Dumont D’Urville, 29280, Plouzané, France
   Fish Ecology and Conservation Physiology Laboratory, Department of Biology and Institute of Environmental and Interdisciplinary Science, Carleton University, Ottawa, ON, K1S 5B6, Canada
   MARBEC, Univ. de Montpellier, IFREMER, IRD, CNRS, Sète, France
   Ifremer, Ecologie et Modèles Pour l’Halieutique, Nantes, France
C2 IFREMER, FRANCE
   CNRS, FRANCE
   UNIV CARLETON, CANADA
   IFREMER, FRANCE
   IFREMER, FRANCE
SI BREST
   SETE
   NANTES
SE PDG-RBE-STH-LBH
   PDG-RBE-MARBEC-LHM
   PDG-RBE-EMH
UM LEMAR
   MARBEC
IN WOS Ifremer UPR
   WOS Ifremer UMR
   WOS Cotutelle UMR
   copubli-france
   copubli-int-hors-europe
IF 6.845
TC 18
UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00727/83874/88824.pdf
LA English
DT Article
DE ;Biomarker;Marine fish;Conservation physiology;Management;Climate change
AB The benefits of physiological biomarkers, knowledge and concepts are well-established in fish and wildlife management as they confer the ability to understand mechanistic processes, identify cause-and-effect relationships, and develop predictive models. Although this approach is gaining momentum in the context of species conservation, the use of physiological biomarkers in exploited marine fish stock management and recovery plans remains relatively rare. Here, we present five essential issues to consider to implement physiological biomarkers in fisheries management: (i) choice of relevant biomarkers that have a well-known mechanistic basis, (ii) identification of species-specific biomarkers reflecting a meaningful timespan for management, (iii) selection of biomarkers compatible with data collection during routine scientific fisheries surveys, (iv) use of biomarkers as early-warning signals and complementary indicators of population-level changes in life history traits and (v) how physiological biomarkers may help to refine long-term population dynamic projections under climate change and management scenarios. Overall, if based on well-established mechanisms linked to individuals’ fitness, a focus on physiological biomarkers should help to better understand the mechanisms behind stock declines, changes in stock characteristics, and thus more efficiently manage marine fisheries and conserve populations. As this approach is transferable among species, locations, and times, the integration of physiological biomarkers in fisheries science has the potential to more broadly enhance assessments and management of fish stocks. 
PY 2021
PD DEC
SO Reviews In Fish Biology And Fisheries
SN 0960-3166
PU Springer Science and Business Media LLC
VL 31
IS 4
UT 000701361000001
BP 797
EP 819
DI 10.1007/s11160-021-09677-5
ID 83874
ER

EF