FN Archimer Export Format
PT J
TI Guidance for stakeholder consultation to support national ecosystem services assessment: A case study from French marine assessment
BT 
AF Scemama, Pierre
   Mongruel, Remi
   Kermagoret, Charlene
   Bailly, Denis
   CARLIER, Antoine
   LE MAO, Patrick
   Vaschalde, Diane
AS 1:1;2:1;3:1,2;4:3;5:4;6:5;7:2;
FF 1:PDG-RBE-EM;2:PDG-RBE-EM;3:PDG-RBE-EM;4:;5:PDG-ODE-DYNECO-LEBCO;6:PDG-ODE-LITTORAL-LERBN;7:;
C1 IFREMER, Univ Brest, CNRS, UMR AMURE, Rue Dumont d'Urville, 29280 Plouzané, France
   Service usages et gestion de la biodiversité, Direction acteurs et citoyens, Office français de la biodiversité, Antenne de Brest, France
   University of Brest, Ifremer, CNRS, UMR 6308, AMURE, Unité d’Economie Maritime, IUEM, F-29280, Plouzané, France
   Ifremer, Centre de Bretagne, DYNECO - Laboratoire d’écologie benthique côtière, ZI de la Pointe du Diable - CS 10070, Plouzané 29280, France
   Ifremer, Lab Environm & Ressources Bretagne Nord, 38 Rue Port Blanc, BP 80108, F-35801, Dinard, France
C2 IFREMER, FRANCE
   OFB, FRANCE
   UBO, FRANCE
   IFREMER, FRANCE
   IFREMER, FRANCE
SI BREST
   DINARD
SE PDG-RBE-EM
   PDG-ODE-DYNECO-LEBCO
   PDG-ODE-LITTORAL-LERBN
UM AMURE
IN WOS Ifremer UPR
   WOS Ifremer UMR
   WOS Cotutelle UMR
   copubli-france
   copubli-univ-france
IF 7.6
TC 1
UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00748/85997/91265.pdf
LA English
DT Article
DE ;National ecosystem assessment;Marine and coastal ecosystem services;Participative approach;Strategic evaluation
AB In line with international frameworks and following the example of other countries, France conducted a national ecosystem services (ES) assessment in 2012. National assessments are intended to be both comprehensive and useful. In practice, these objectives are conflicting and difficult to reach, leading the experts in charge of the assessment to allocate effort according to their own priorities. In the case of the marine part of the French ES assessment, we consulted stakeholders at the national scale to better connect the assessment to the interest of the end-users. We implemented a participatory approach based on a combination of workshops and online questionnaires. We collected stakeholder’s perception of (i) ES bundle; (ii) hierarchization of issues; (iii) specific issues of concern; and (iv) research needs for different types of marine ecosystems and groups of species. The results of the consultation assisted the assessment process in selecting key issues that necessitate in-depth analysis, and identifying discrepancies between stakeholders’ perceptions and the scientific knowledge that need to be addressed. Stakeholders’ perceptions were also mobilized as an additional source of data to inform decision-makers regarding the state of ecosystems and their ES. In the end, this work underlines the importance of stakeholder’s consultation to support ES assessment and provides guidance for its implementation in the future. Our results can also inform research needs to support the conservation of marine ecosystems. 
PY 2022
PD APR
SO Ecosystem Services
SN 2212-0416
PU Elsevier BV
VL 54
UT 000788738600009
DI 10.1016/j.ecoser.2022.101408
ID 85997
ER

EF