FN Archimer Export Format PT J TI Trade-offs between bycatch and target catches in static versus dynamic fishery closures BT AF Pons, Maite Watson, Jordan T. Ovando, Daniel Andraka, Sandra Brodie, Stephanie Domingo, Andrés Fitchett, Mark Forselledo, Rodrigo Hall, Martin Hazen, Elliott L. Jannot, Jason E. Herrera, Miguel Jiménez, Sebastián Kaplan, David Kerwath, Sven Lopez, Jon McVeigh, Jon Pacheco, Lucas Rendon, Liliana Richerson, Kate Sant’Ana, Rodrigo Sharma, Rishi Smith, James A. Somers, Kayleigh Hilborn, Ray AS 1:1;2:2;3:1;4:3;5:4,5;6:6;7:7;8:6;9:8;10:4,5;11:9;12:10;13:6;14:11,12;15:13,14;16:8;17:9;18:3;19:3;20:9;21:15;22:16;23:4,17;24:9;25:1; FF 1:;2:;3:;4:;5:;6:;7:;8:;9:;10:;11:;12:;13:;14:;15:;16:;17:;18:;19:;20:;21:;22:;23:;24:;25:; C1 School of Aquatic and Fishery Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195-5020; USA Auke Bay Laboratories, Alaska Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Juneau, AK 99801; USA EcoPacific Plus Consulting, San José 10111, Costa Rica Institute of Marine Sciences, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA 93950, USA Environmental Research Division, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Monterey, CA 93950, USA Laboratorio de Recursos Pelágicos, Dirección Nacional de Recursos Acuáticos, Montevideo 11200, Uruguay Western Pacific Regional Fishery Management Council, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA Inter-American Tropical Tuna Commission, Bycatch Program, San Diego, CA 92037, USA Northwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Seattle, WA 98115; USA Producers’ Organization of Large Tuna Freezers, Madrid 28001, Spain Marine Biodiversity Exploitation and Conservation (MARBEC), Université Montpellier, CNRS, L'Institut Français de Recherche pour l'Exploitation de la Mer (Ifremer), IRD, Sète 34203, France Institut de Recherche Pour le Développement (IRD), Sète 34203, France; Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town 7700, South Africa Department of Forestry, Fisheries and the Environment, Cape Town 7700, South Africa Laboratório de Estudos Marinhos Aplicados, Escola do Mar, Ciência e Tecnologia, Universidade do Vale do Itajaí, Itajaí, SC 3109, Brazil; Marine and Inland Fisheries Division, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, 00153 Rome, Italy Fisheries Resources Division, Southwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, La Jolla, CA 92104, USA C2 UNIV WASHINGTON, USA NOAA, USA ECOPACIFIC PLUS CONSULTING, COSTA RICA UNIV CALIF SANTA CRUZ, USA NOAA, USA DIREC NAC REC ACUATICOS, URUGUAY WPRFMC, USA IATTC, USA NOAA, USA OPAGAC, SPAIN IRD, FRANCE IRD, FRANCE UNIV CAPE TOWN, SOUTH AFRICA DFFE, SOUTH AFRICA UNIV VALE ITAJAI (UNIVALI), BRAZIL FAO, ITALY NOAA, USA UM MARBEC IN WOS Cotutelle UMR copubli-europe copubli-int-hors-europe copubli-sud IF 11.1 TC 33 UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00748/86006/91228.pdf https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00748/86006/91229.pdf LA English DT Article DE ;static and dynamic closures;bycatch mitigation;fisheries management;marine protected areas AB While there have been recent improvements in reducing bycatch in many fisheries, bycatch remains a threat for numerous species around the globe. Static spatial and temporal closures are used in many places as a tool to reduce bycatch. However, their effectiveness in achieving this goal is uncertain, particularly for highly mobile species. We evaluated evidence for the effects of temporal, static, and dynamic area closures on the bycatch and target catch of 15 fisheries around the world. Assuming perfect knowledge of where the catch and bycatch occurs and a closure of 30% of the fishing area, we found that dynamic area closures could reduce bycatch by an average of 57% without sacrificing catch of target species, compared to 16% reductions in bycatch achievable by static closures. The degree of bycatch reduction achievable for a certain quantity of target catch was related to the correlation in space and time between target and bycatch species. If the correlation was high, it was harder to find an area to reduce bycatch without sacrificing catch of target species. If the goal of spatial closures is to reduce bycatch, our results suggest that dynamic management provides substantially better outcomes than classic static marine area closures. The use of dynamic ocean management might be difficult to implement and enforce in many regions. Nevertheless, dynamic approaches will be increasingly valuable as climate change drives species and fisheries into new habitats or extended ranges, altering species-fishery interactions and underscoring the need for more responsive and flexible regulatory mechanisms. PY 2022 PD JAN SO Proceedings Of The National Academy Of Sciences Of The United States Of America SN 0027-8424 PU Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences VL 119 IS 4 UT 000758466500001 DI 10.1073/pnas.2114508119 ID 86006 ER EF