FN Archimer Export Format PT J TI Characterization of gas‐bearing sediments in coastal environment using geophysical and geotechnical data BT AF Dusart, Judith Tarits, Pascal Fabre, Maud Marsset, Bruno Jouet, Gwenael Ehrhold, Axel Riboulot, Vincent Baltzer, Agnes AS 1:1,2;2:1,2;3:1;4:3;5:3;6:3;7:3;8:4; FF 1:;2:;3:PDG-REM-GEOOCEAN-ALMA;4:PDG-REM-GEOOCEAN-ALMA;5:PDG-REM-GEOOCEAN-ASTRE;6:PDG-REM-GEOOCEAN-ASTRE;7:PDG-REM-GEOOCEAN-ALMA;8:; C1 European Institute for Marine Studies (IUEM) ,Plouzané , France Mappem Geophysics SAS Saint‐Renan , France Ifremer, Plouzané , France University of Nantes, Lab Geolittomer Nantes 3, France C2 UBO, FRANCE MAPPEM GEOPHYSICS SAS, FRANCE IFREMER, FRANCE UNIV NANTES, FRANCE SI BREST SE PDG-REM-GEOOCEAN-ALMA PDG-REM-GEOOCEAN-ASTRE UM GEO-OCEAN IN WOS Ifremer UMR WOS Cotutelle UMR copubli-france copubli-univ-france IF 1.6 TC 1 UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00783/89484/94998.pdf LA English DT Article CR ESS_FLUTE PLATEAU SYPOCO 2018 BO Thalia DE ;electrical resistivity tomography;modelling;porosity;seismics;shallow marine AB Seismic investigation in marine gas-bearing sediments fails to get information below the acoustic mask created by free gas. To circumvent this problem, we combined collocated multichannel ultra-high resolution seismic imaging, marine electrical resistivity tomography (MERT) and core sampling to study the physical properties of gas-bearing sediments in the Bay of Concarneau (France). We obtained sections of compression (P-) wave velocitvalues where free gas was identified in seismic data. We tested a joint processing workflow combining the 1D inversion of the MERT data with the 2D P-wave velocity through a structural coupling between resistivity and velocity. We obtained a series of 2D resistivity models fitting the data whilst in agreement with. The resulting models showed the continuity of the geological units below the acoustic gas fronts which is associated with paleo-valley sediment infilling. We were able to demonstrate relationships between resistivity and velocity differing from superficial to deeper sediments. We established these relationships at the geophysical scale then compared the results to data from core sampliand porosity). We inferred the porosity distribution from the MERT data. At the core locations, we observed a good agreement between this geophysical scale porosity and the core data both within and outside the gas-bearing sediments. This agreement demonstrated that resistivity could be used as a proxy for porosity where no was available below gas caps. In these regions, the observed low resistivity showed a high porosity (60-70%) down to about 10–20 m in depth in contrast with the surrounding medium with porosity less than 55%. These results support the hypothesis that failures inside the paleo-valley sediment could control the gas migration PY 2022 PD OCT SO Near Surface Geophysics SN 1569-4445 PU Wiley VL 20 IS 5 UT 000842631200001 BP 478 EP 493 DI 10.1002/nsg.12230 ID 89484 ER EF