FN Archimer Export Format PT J TI Bringing the Nature Futures Framework to life: creating a set of illustrative narratives of nature futures BT AF Durán, América Paz Kuiper, Jan J. Aguiar, Ana Paula Dutra Cheung, William W. L. Diaw, Mariteuw Chimère Halouani, Ghassen Hashimoto, Shizuka Gasalla, Maria A. Peterson, Garry D. Schoolenberg, Machteld A. Abbasov, Rovshan Acosta, Lilibeth A. Armenteras, Dolors Davila, Federico Denboba, Mekuria Argaw Harrison, Paula A. Harhash, Khaled Allam Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, Sylvia Kim, HyeJin Lundquist, Carolyn J. Miller, Brian W. Okayasu, Sana Pichs-Madruga, Ramon Sathyapalan, Jyothis Saysel, Ali Kerem Yu, Dandan Pereira, Laura M. AS 1:1,2;2:3;3:3,4;4:5;5:6,7;6:8;7:9;8:10;9:3;10:11;11:12;12:13;13:14;14:15;15:16;16:17;17:18;18:19;19:20,21;20:22,23;21:24;22:11;23:25;24:26;25:27;26:28;27:3,29; FF 1:;2:;3:;4:;5:;6:PDG-RBE-HMMN-LRHBL;7:;8:;9:;10:;11:;12:;13:;14:;15:;16:;17:;18:;19:;20:;21:;22:;23:;24:;25:;26:;27:; C1 Instituto de Ciencias Ambientales y Evolutivas, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile Instituto de Ecología y Biodiversidad (IEB-Chile), Santiago, Chile Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, Kräftriket 2B, 104 05, Stockholm, Sweden National Institute for Space Research (INPE), Av. dos Astronautas 1758, São José dos Campos, SP, CEP: 12227-010, Brazil Institute for the Oceans and Fisheries, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada African Model Forests Network, BP 33678, Yaoundé, Cameroon African Model Forests Network, BP 2384, Dakar, Senegal IFREMER, Unité halieutique Manche‐Mer du Nord Ifremer, HMMN, 62200, Boulogne sur Mer, France Department of Ecosystem Studies, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan Fisheries Ecosystems Laboratory (LabPesq), Oceanographic Institute, University of Sao Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil PBL Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, The Hague, The Netherlands Department of Geography and Environment, Khazar University, Baku, Azerbaijan Climate Action and Inclusive Development Department, Global Green Growth Institute (GGGI), Seoul, South Korea Departamento de Biologia, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogota, Colombia Institute for Sustainable Futures, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia Center for Environmental Science, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Bailrigg, Lancaster, UK Egyptian Environmental Affairs Agency, Ministry of Environment, Cairo, Egypt Public Administration and Policy Group, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Salle), Germany National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Hamilton, New Zealand School of Environment, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand U.S. Geological Survey, North Central Climate Adaptation Science Center, Boulder, CO, USA Centro de Investigaciones de la Economia Mundial (CIEM), La Habana, Cuba National Institute of Rural Development and Panchayati Raj Hyderabad, Hyderabad, India Institute of Environmental Sciences, Boğaziçi University, Istanbul, Turkey Nanjing Institute of Environmental Sciences (NIES), Ministry of Ecology and Environment (MEE) of China, 8 Jiangwangmiao Street, Nanjing, 210042, People’s Republic of China Global Change Institute, Wits University, Johannesburg, South Africa C2 UNIV AUSTRAL CHILE, CHILE IEB-CHILE, CHILE UNIV STOCKHOLM, SWEDEN INPE, BRAZIL MPO, CANADA AFRICAN MODEL FORESTS NETWORK, CAMEROON AFRICAN MODEL FORESTS NETWORK, SENEGAL IFREMER, FRANCE UNIV TOKYO, JAPAN UNIV SAO PAULO, BRAZIL PBL NETHERLANDS ENVIRONM ASSESSMENT AGCY, NETHERLANDS UNIV KHAZAR, AZERBAIJAN GGGI, SOUTH KOREA UNIV NACL COLOMBIA, COLOMBIA UNIV TECH SYDNEY, AUSTRALIA UNIV ADDIS ABABA, ETHIOPIA UK CEH, UK EEAA, EGYPT UNIV WAGENINGEN, NETHERLANDS IDIV, GERMANY UNIV HALLE WITTENBERG, GERMANY NIWA, NEW ZEALAND UNIV AUCKLAND, NEW ZEALAND US GEOL SURVEY, USA CIEM, CUBA NIRD&PR, INDIA UNIV BOGAZICI, TURKEY NIES, CHINA UNIV WITS, SOUTH AFRICA SI BOULOGNE SE PDG-RBE-HMMN-LRHBL IF 6 TC 0 UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00836/94763/102262.pdf https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00836/94763/102263.xlsx https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00836/94763/102264.docx https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00836/94763/102265.docx LA English DT Article DE ;Biodiversity;IPBES;Nature values;NCP;Scenarios;Transformation AB To halt further destruction of the biosphere, most people and societies around the globe need to transform their relationships with nature. The internationally agreed vision under the Convention of Biological Diversity—Living in harmony with nature—is that “By 2050, biodiversity is valued, conserved, restored and wisely used, maintaining ecosystem services, sustaining a healthy planet and delivering benefits essential for all people”. In this context, there are a variety of debates between alternative perspectives on how to achieve this vision. Yet, scenarios and models that are able to explore these debates in the context of “living in harmony with nature” have not been widely developed. To address this gap, the Nature Futures Framework has been developed to catalyse the development of new scenarios and models that embrace a plurality of perspectives on desirable futures for nature and people. In this paper, members of the IPBES task force on scenarios and models provide an example of how the Nature Futures Framework can be implemented for the development of illustrative narratives representing a diversity of desirable nature futures: information that can be used to assess and develop scenarios and models whilst acknowledging the underpinning value perspectives on nature. Here, the term illustrative reflects the multiple ways in which desired nature futures can be captured by these narratives. In addition, to explore the interdependence between narratives, and therefore their potential to be translated into scenarios and models, the six narratives developed here were assessed around three areas of the transformative change debate, specifically, (1) land sparing vs. land sharing, (2) Half Earth vs. Whole Earth conservation, and (3) green growth vs. post-growth economic development. The paper concludes with an assessment of how the Nature Futures Framework could be used to assist in developing and articulating transformative pathways towards desirable nature futures. PY 2023 PD MAY SO Sustainability Science SN 1862-4065 PU Springer Science and Business Media LLC DI 10.1007/s11625-023-01316-1 ID 94763 ER EF