FN Archimer Export Format
PT J
TI Three major mesoplanktonic communities resolved by in situ imaging in the upper 500 m of the global ocean
BT 
AF Panaïotis, Thelma
   Babin, Marcel
   Biard, Tristan
   Carlotti, François
   Coppola, Laurent
   Guidi, Lionel
   Hauss, Helena
   Karp‐Boss, Lee
   Kiko, Rainer
   Lombard, Fabien
   McDonnell, Andrew M. P.
   Picheral, Marc
   Rogge, Andreas
   Waite, Anya M.
   Stemmann, Lars
   Irisson, Jean‐Olivier
AS 1:1;2:2;3:3;4:4;5:1;6:1;7:5,6;8:7;9:1,5;10:1;11:8;12:1;13:9;14:10;15:1;16:1;
FF 1:;2:;3:;4:;5:;6:;7:;8:;9:;10:;11:;12:;13:;14:;15:;16:;
C1 Laboratoire d'Océanographie de Villefranche Sorbonne Université, CNRS Villefranche‐sur‐Mer ,France
   Takuvik International Research Laboratory (IRL 3376) CNRS and Université Laval Québec, Canada
   Laboratoire d'Océanologie et de Géosciences Univ. Littoral Côte d'Opale, Univ. Lille, CNRS, IRD Wimereux, France
   Mediterranean Institute of Oceanography, Aix‐Marseille Université, Université de Toulon, CNRS, IRD, UMR 7294 Marseille ,France
   GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel, Germany
   NORCE Norwegian Research Centre Bergen ,Norway
   School of Marine Sciences, University of Maine Orono Maine, USA
   Oceanography Department University of Alaska Fairbanks Fairbanks Alaska, USA
   Alfred Wegener Institute Helmholtz Center for Polar and Marine Research Bremerhaven ,Germany
   Department of Oceanography Ocean Frontier Institute, Dalhousie University Halifax ,Canada
C2 UNIV SORBONNE, FRANCE
   UNIV LAVAL, CANADA
   UNIV LITTORAL COTE D'OPALE, FRANCE
   UNIV AIX MARSEILLE, FRANCE
   IFM GEOMAR, GERMANY
   NORCE, NORWAY
   UNIV MAINE, USA
   UNIV ALASKA, USA
   INST A WEGENER, GERMANY
   UNIV DALHOUSIE, CANADA
IF 6.4
TC 0
UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00849/96097/104181.pdf
   https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00849/96097/104182.pdf
LA English
DT Article
CR BOUM
   CASSIOPEE
   DEWEX-MERMEX 2013 LEG1
   DEWEX-MERMEX 2013 LEG2
   MD 188 / KEOPS 2
   MOOSE-GE
   OUTPACE
   SOMBA-GE-2014
BO L'Atalante
   Le Suroît
   Marion Dufresne
   Téthys II
DE ;biogeography;Copepoda;global ocean;in situ imagery;plankton communities;Rhizaria;spatial distribution;Trichodesmium
AB AimThe distribution of mesoplankton communities has been poorly studied at global scale, especially from in situ instruments. This study aims to (1) describe the global distribution of mesoplankton communities in relation to their environment and (2) assess the ability of various environmental‐based ocean regionalizations to explain the distribution of these communities. LocationGlobal ocean, 0–500 m depth. Time Period2008–2019. Major Taxa StudiedTwenty‐eight groups of large mesoplanktonic and macroplanktonic organisms, covering Metazoa, Rhizaria and Cyanobacteria. MethodsFrom a global data set of 2500 vertical profiles making use of the Underwater Vision Profiler 5 (UVP5), an in situ imaging instrument, we studied the global distribution of large (>600 μm) mesoplanktonic organisms. Among the 6.8 million imaged objects, 330,000 were large zooplanktonic organisms and phytoplankton colonies, the rest consisting of marine snow particles. Multivariate ordination (PCA) and clustering were used to describe patterns in community composition, while comparison with existing regionalizations was performed with regression methods (RDA). ResultsWithin the observed size range, epipelagic plankton communities were Trichodesmium‐enriched in the intertropical Atlantic, Copepoda‐enriched at high latitudes and in upwelling areas, and Rhizaria‐enriched in oligotrophic areas. In the mesopelagic layer, Copepoda‐enriched communities were also found at high latitudes and in the Atlantic Ocean, while Rhizaria‐enriched communities prevailed in the Peruvian upwelling system and a few mixed communities were found elsewhere. The comparison between the distribution of these communities and a set of existing regionalizations of the ocean suggested that the structure of plankton communities described above is mostly driven by basin‐level environmental conditions. Main ConclusionsIn both layers, three types of plankton communities emerged and seemed to be mostly driven by regional environmental conditions. This work sheds light on the role not only of metazoans, but also of unexpected large protists and cyanobacteria in structuring large mesoplankton communities. 
PY 2023
PD NOV
SO Global Ecology And Biogeography
SN 1466-822X
PU Wiley
VL 32
IS 11
UT 001043543000001
BP 1991
EP 2005
DI 10.1111/geb.13741
ID 96097
ER

EF