FN Archimer Export Format PT J TI Environmental DNA complements scientific trawling in surveys of marine fish biodiversity BT AF VERON, Pierre ROZANSKI, Romane Marques, Virginie Joost, Stéphane DESCHEZ, Marie Emilie TRENKEL, Verena LORANCE, Pascal Valentini, Alice Polanco F., Andréa PELLISSIER, Loïc EME, David ALBOUY, Camille AS 1:1,2;2:1,3,4;3:3,4;4:5;5:1;6:1;7:1;8:6;9:7;10:3,4;11:1,8;12:1,3,4; FF 1:;2:PDG-RBE-HALGO-EMH;3:;4:;5:PDG-RBE-HALGO-EMH;6:PDG-RBE-HALGO;7:PDG-RBE-HALGO-EMH;8:;9:;10:;11:PDG-RBE-EMH;12:PDG-RBE-HALGO-EMH; C1 DECOD (Ecosystem Dynamics and Sustainability), IFREMER, INRAe, Institut-Agro—Agrocampus Ouest, Nantes, France Institut de biologie de l’École normale supérieure (IBENS), École normale supérieure, CNRS, INSERM, UniversitéPSL, Paris, 75005, France Ecosystem and Landscape Evolution, Institute of Terrestrial Ecosystems, Department of Environmental Systems Science, ETH Zürich, Zürich, 8092, Switzerland Unit of Land Change Science, Swiss Federal Research Institute WSL, Birmensdorf, 8903, Switzerland Group of Geospatial Molecular Epidemiology (GEOME), Laboratory for Biological Geochemistry (LGB), School of Architecture, Civil and Environmental Engineering (ENAC), École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, 1015, Switzerland SPYGEN, Le Bourget-du-Lac, 73370, France Fundación Biodiversa, Bogotá, Calle 65 # 16 - 69 ;111221, Colombia RiverLY Research Unit, National Research Institute for Agriculture Food and Environment (INRAE), Villeurbanne, 69100, France C2 IFREMER, FRANCE ENS, FRANCE ETH ZURICH, SWITZERLAND SWISS FED RES INST WSL, SWITZERLAND EPFL, SWITZERLAND SPYGEN, FRANCE FUNDACION BIODIVERSA, COLOMBIA INRAE, FRANCE SI NANTES SE PDG-RBE-HALGO-EMH PDG-RBE-HALGO PDG-RBE-EMH UM DECOD IN WOS Ifremer UMR DOAJ copubli-france copubli-int-hors-europe copubli-sud IF 3.3 TC 1 UR https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00854/96572/105007.pdf https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00854/96572/105008.docx LA English DT Article CR EVHOE EVALUATION HALIEUTIQUE OUEST DE L'EUROPE DE ;Actinopterygii;Bay of Biscay;beta-diversity;Chondrichthyes;functional diversity;metabarcoding;phylogenetic diversity;taxonomic diversity AB Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is a method to detect taxa from environmental samples. It is increasingly used for marine biodiversity surveys. As it only requires water collection, eDNA metabarcoding is less invasive than scientific trawling and might be more cost effective. Here, we analysed data from both sampling methods applied in the same scientific survey targeting Northeast Atlantic fish in the Bay of Biscay. We compared the methods regarding the distribution of taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional diversity. We found that eDNA captured more taxonomic and phylogenetic richness than bottom trawling and more functional richness at the local scale. eDNA was less selective than trawling and detected species in local communities spanning larger phylogenetic and functional breadths, especially as it detected large pelagic species that escaped the trawl, even though trawling detected more flat fish. eDNA indicated differences in fish community composition that were comparable to those based on trawling. However, consistency between abundance estimates provided by eDNA metabarcoding and trawl catches was low, even after accounting for allometric scaling in eDNA production. We conclude that eDNA metabarcoding is a promising method that can complement scientific trawling for multi-component biodiversity monitoring based on presence/absence, but not yet for abundance. PY 2023 PD OCT SO Ices Journal Of Marine Science SN 1054-3139 PU Oxford university press VL 80 IS 8 UT 001068389400001 BP 2150 EP 2165 DI 10.1093/icesjms/fsad139 ID 96572 ER EF