Freshwater protected areas: an effective measure to reconcile conservation and exploitation of the threatened European eels (Anguilla anguilla)?
|Author(s)||Cucherousset J1, Paillisson J1, Carpentier A1, Thoby V2, Damien J2, Eybert M1, Feunteun Eric3, 5, Robinet T4, 5|
|Affiliation(s)||1 : Univ Rennes 1, Equipe Biol Populat & Conservat, UMR ECOBIO CNRS 6553, Rennes, France.
2 : Parc Nat Reg Briere, St Joachim, France.
3 : Museum Natl Hist Nat, Stn Marine Dinard, Paris, France.
4 : Univ La Rochelle, UMR CNRS IFREMER 6217, CRELA, La Rochelle, France.
|Source||Ecology of Freshwater Fish (0906-6691) (Blackwell science), 2007-12 , Vol. 16 , N. 4 , P. 528-538|
|WOS© Times Cited||18|
|Keyword(s)||Coastal freshwater marsh, Habitat restoration, Protected area, Spawners production, Anguilla anguilla|
|Abstract||For decades, the European eel Anguilla anguilla (L.) population has been declining strongly despite several management attempts, so additional experiments need to be conducted on management measures. The use of freshwater protected areas has been advocated but their efficiency has never been assessed. In this study, we investigated whether the population structure and the silver eel (mature migrating stage) production differ in fished and protected areas within a marsh wetland (Briere, 7000 ha, Northwest France), using an intensive biological study (electrofishing and trapping) and a survey of the traditional fishery (licenses, questionnaires and creel surveys). First, we found that fishermen mainly targeted > 320-mm yellow eels (sedentary stage) using pots and square dipping nets and that harvest by fishermen was highly variable at different locations in the study area. Secondly, we found differences in the size-class structures and mortality rates between protected and fished areas. Mortality rates of eels > 320 mm was positively correlated with harvest by fishermen. Furthermore, the proportion of potentially migrating eels in the total population was found to be higher in the protected areas than in fished areas (6.38% vs. 1.42%, respectively). Thirdly, we found that protected areas potentially produce 8.4% of the total silver eel production whereas they only account for 2.4% of the aquatic habitat area. We estimated that a size adjustment of protected areas to 31.1% with maintaining the current fishery would produce 50% of the potential silver eel of a fully protected marsh. Protection of freshwater areas appears to be a promising management measure and a constructive consensual way to integrate the patrimonial and societal value of the traditional fishery and the international management plans for European eels. Furthermore, freshwater protective measures can be an effective local solution if they are integrated into the framework of freshwater biodiversity management and accompanied by other management measures that focus on all eel life stages.|