Interactions between ammonium and urea uptake by five strains of Alexandrium catenella (Dinophyceae) in culture

Short-term experiments were carried out to investigate whether interactions between ammonium (NH4+) and urea uptake regulate the total nitrogen assimilation of the toxic dinoflagellate Alexandrium catenella. To test for strain variability, 5 strains of A. catenella from the NW Mediterranean were used: 3 strains from the Thau lagoon (southern France) and 2 strains from the Catalonia basin (Spain). For each strain, the uptake rate of 1 nutrient (NH4+ or urea) at a reference concentration (10 mu gatN l(-1)) was measured as a function of the increasing concentration of the other nutrient (0 to 10 mu gatN l(-1)). Simultaneous N uptake rates of the distinct nitrogen sources were obtained from N-15-NH4+ and N-15-urea incorporation measurements. A strong inhibition of urea uptake by NH4+ (maximum inhibition, I-max > 55%) was observed exclusively for the French strains. No influence of urea on the NH4+-uptake rate was noted for any strain. Estimation of total N uptake rates revealed that the N-urea uptake inhibition was not a competitive disadvantage for A. catenella cells considering that the reduced N-urea uptake was more than compensated for by NH4+ uptake. Furthermore, the Computation of composite kinetic parameters from total N uptake data suggested that French strains were more competitive than the Spanish ones in an environment characterized by low NH4+ concentrations (<= 5 mu gatN l(-1)) and high Urea concentrations (as 10 mu gatN l(-1)). These N uptake characteristics may reflect particular metabolic adaptations by the strains to their respective environment.

Keyword(s)

Strain variability, Interactions, Urea, Ammonium, Alexandrium catenella

Full Text

FilePagesSizeAccess
5635.pdf
10258 Ko
How to cite
Jauzein Cecile, Loureiro Sofia, Garces Esther, Collos Yves (2008). Interactions between ammonium and urea uptake by five strains of Alexandrium catenella (Dinophyceae) in culture. Aquatic Microbial Ecology. 53 (3). 271-280. https://doi.org/10.3354/ame01249, https://archimer.ifremer.fr/doc/00000/6432/

Copy this text